Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25782669›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2015

Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening.

Wybo Dondorp, Guido de Wert, Yvonne Bombard, Diana W Bianchi, Carsten Bergmann, Pascal Borry, Lyn S Chitty, Florence Fellmann, Francesca Forzano, Alison Hall and 14 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 119 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cost-effectiveness of cell-free DNA in maternal blood testing for prenatal detection of trisomy 21, 18 and 13: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. ESC guidelines 2025 on cardiovascular disease and pregnancy: considerations and future perspectives.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Should the scope of NIPT be limited by a 'threshold of seriousness'?European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): A Paradigm Shift in Prenatal Care.International journal of preventive medicine · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Wybo DondorpDepartment of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Guido de WertDepartment of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Yvonne BombardLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital & Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Diana W BianchiDepartment of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Carsten BergmannCenter for Human Genetics Bioscientia, Ingelheim, Germany.
Pascal BorryDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven University, Belgium.
Lyn S ChittyClinical and Molecular Genetics Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital and UCLH NHS Foundations Trusts, London, UK.
Florence FellmannService of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Francesca ForzanoMedical Genetics Unit, Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy.
Alison HallPHG Foundation, Cambridge, UK.
Lidewij HennemanSection Community Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Heidi C HowardCentre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anneke LucassenDepartment of Clinical Ethics and Law (CELS), University of Southampton and Wessex Clinical Genetic Service, Southampton, UK.
Kelly OrmondDepartment of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Borut PeterlinClinical Institute of Medical Genetics, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Dragica RadojkovicLaboratory for Molecular Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering (IMGGE), University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Wolf RogowskiDeutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt, Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany.
Maria SollerDivision Clinical Genetics, University and Regional Laboratories Region Skåne, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Aad TibbenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lisbeth TranebjærgDepartment of Audiology, Bispebjerg Hospital/Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Carla G van ElSection Community Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martina C CornelSection Community Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
European Society of Human Genetics
American Society of Human Genetics

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0707-10107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper contains a joint ESHG/ASHG position document with recommendations regarding responsible innovation in prenatal screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). By virtue of its greater accuracy and safety with respect to prenatal screening for common autosomal aneuploidies, NIPT has the potential of helping the practice better achieve its aim of facilitating autonomous reproductive choices, provided that balanced pretest information and non-directive counseling are available as part of the screening offer. Depending on the health-care setting, different scenarios for NIPT-based screening for common autosomal aneuploidies are possible. The trade-offs involved in these scenarios should be assessed in light of the aim of screening, the balance of benefits and burdens for pregnant women and their partners and considerations of cost-effectiveness and justice. With improving screening technologies and decreasing costs of sequencing and analysis, it will become possible in the near future to significantly expand the scope of prenatal screening beyond common autosomal aneuploidies. Commercial providers have already begun expanding their tests to include sex-chromosomal abnormalities and microdeletions. However, multiple false positives may undermine the main achievement of NIPT in the context of prenatal screening: the significant reduction of the invasive testing rate. This document argues for a cautious expansion of the scope of prenatal screening to serious congenital and childhood disorders, only following sound validation studies and a comprehensive evaluation of all relevant aspects. A further core message of this document is that in countries where prenatal screening is offered as a public health programme, governments and public health authorities should adopt an active role to ensure the responsible innovation of prenatal screening on the basis of ethical principles. Crucial elements are the quality of the screening process as a whole (including non-laboratory aspects such as information and counseling), education of professionals, systematic evaluation of all aspects of prenatal screening, development of better evaluation tools in the light of the aim of the practice, accountability to all stakeholders including children born from screened pregnancies and persons living with the conditions targeted in prenatal screening and promotion of equity of access.

Indexed as

AneuploidyPrenatal DiagnosisChromosome DisordersDown SyndromeFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansPregnancyTrisomyUltrasonography, Prenatal

Identifiers

PMID25782669
PMCPMC4613463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.