ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2015
Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 119 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
119 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- AI-guided meta-analysis of non-invasive prenatal testing platforms for trisomy 21 screening: comparative evaluation of cffDNA and fetal cell-based approaches.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of cell-free DNA in maternal blood testing for prenatal detection of trisomy 21, 18 and 13: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018Pooled it
- Complete chromosome 21 centromere sequencing of families with Down syndrome.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Impact of Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening on Sex Chromosome Aneuploidy Diagnoses in Infants and Children.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- Alpha-Fetoprotein as a Biomarker in Pregnancy: From Genetic Disorders to Obstetric Complications.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- ESC guidelines 2025 on cardiovascular disease and pregnancy: considerations and future perspectives.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Midwives 'views of parents' questions and expectations on prenatal genetic testing - identifying informational needs in prenatal genetic counselling.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- Outcomes of pregnancies that screened positive for sex chromosome aneuploidy ascertained via cell-free DNA screening.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Complete chromosome 21 centromere sequencing of families with Down syndrome reveals centromere size asymmetry.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive chromosomal abnormality detection: integrating CNV-Seq with traditional karyotyping in prenatal diagnostics.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
- Should the scope of NIPT be limited by a 'threshold of seriousness'?European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Blazing the Trail of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening Expanded Use: Healthcare Providers' Perspectives.Prenatal diagnosis · 2025Article
- Understanding Genetic Screening: Harnessing Health Information to Prevent Disease Risks.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): A Paradigm Shift in Prenatal Care.International journal of preventive medicine · 2025Review
- High platelet distribution width affects the detection of fetal fraction of cell-free DNA detected by non-invasive prenatal testing.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Factors influencing pregnant women's decision to accept or decline prenatal screening and diagnosis - a qualitative study.Journal of community genetics · 2024Article
- SCAN: a nanopore-based, cost effective decision-supporting tool for mass screening of aneuploidies.Human genomics · 2024Article
- Screening embryos for polygenic disease risk: a review of epidemiological, clinical, and ethical considerations.Human reproduction update · 2024Review
59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper contains a joint ESHG/ASHG position document with recommendations regarding responsible innovation in prenatal screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). By virtue of its greater accuracy and safety with respect to prenatal screening for common autosomal aneuploidies, NIPT has the potential of helping the practice better achieve its aim of facilitating autonomous reproductive choices, provided that balanced pretest information and non-directive counseling are available as part of the screening offer. Depending on the health-care setting, different scenarios for NIPT-based screening for common autosomal aneuploidies are possible. The trade-offs involved in these scenarios should be assessed in light of the aim of screening, the balance of benefits and burdens for pregnant women and their partners and considerations of cost-effectiveness and justice. With improving screening technologies and decreasing costs of sequencing and analysis, it will become possible in the near future to significantly expand the scope of prenatal screening beyond common autosomal aneuploidies. Commercial providers have already begun expanding their tests to include sex-chromosomal abnormalities and microdeletions. However, multiple false positives may undermine the main achievement of NIPT in the context of prenatal screening: the significant reduction of the invasive testing rate. This document argues for a cautious expansion of the scope of prenatal screening to serious congenital and childhood disorders, only following sound validation studies and a comprehensive evaluation of all relevant aspects. A further core message of this document is that in countries where prenatal screening is offered as a public health programme, governments and public health authorities should adopt an active role to ensure the responsible innovation of prenatal screening on the basis of ethical principles. Crucial elements are the quality of the screening process as a whole (including non-laboratory aspects such as information and counseling), education of professionals, systematic evaluation of all aspects of prenatal screening, development of better evaluation tools in the light of the aim of the practice, accountability to all stakeholders including children born from screened pregnancies and persons living with the conditions targeted in prenatal screening and promotion of equity of access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.