Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25782469›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2015

Pharmacodynamic interactions of a solid formulation of sodium oxybate and ethanol in healthy volunteers.

Nathalie Pross, Alain Patat, Philippe Vivet, Michelle Bidaut, Nicolas Fauchoux

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A Brief Up-Date of the Use of Sodium Oxybate for the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nathalie ProssBIOTRIAL, Neuroscience, 6 Avenue de Bruxelles, 68350, Didenheim, France.
Alain PatatBIOTRIAL, 7-9 rue Jean-Louis Bertrand, 35042, Rennes, France.
Philippe VivetD&A PHARMA, 7-9 rue de Miromesnil, 75008, Paris, France.
Michelle BidautBIOTRIAL, 7-9 rue Jean-Louis Bertrand, 35042, Rennes, France.
Nicolas FauchouxBIOTRIAL, 7-9 rue Jean-Louis Bertrand, 35042, Rennes, France.
Iltoo Pharma (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe pharmacologic effects of sodium oxybate (SO) have a number of similarities with those of alcohol. This study evaluated the pharmacodynamic interaction of SMO.IR (a solid immediate release formulation of SO) and alcohol (0.7 (males) or 0.57 (females) g kg(-1) alcohol using 40% vodka).

methodsIn a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial, 24 healthy volunteers received randomly a) 2.25 g SMO.IR and placebo alcohol preparation, b) 2.25 g f SMO.IR and alcohol, c) 2.25 g SMO.IR matching placebo and alcohol and d) 2.25 g of SMO.IR matching placebo and placebo alcohol preparation. Objective and subjective cognitive parameters, adverse events and vital signs were assessed before, 15 and 165 min after treatment administration.

resultsAlcohol produced the expected cognitive impairment and the expected subjective sedation rapidly after intake (from 15 min). The objective effects of SMO.IR were much less pronounced than those of alcohol. The reverse was observed for subjective complaints, which were related to lesser stimulation and greater sedation. Nevertheless, 165 min after administration this sedation feeling was less with SMO.IR than with alcohol. There was a significant interaction between SMO.IR and alcohol at 15 min (i.e. increase in alertness and stimulation and decrease in sedation). In addition, an isolated mild decrease in digit vigilance accuracy occurred at 165 min post-dose after the combination. The co-administration of SMO.IR and alcohol was safe and well-tolerated.

conclusionSMO.IR and alcohol have distinct adverse effect profiles. The objective effects of SMO.IR are much less marked than those of alcohol. No deleterious interaction was observed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttentionCognition DisordersCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodDrug InteractionsDrug LiberationEthanolEye MovementsFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePhotic StimulationPostural BalanceEthanolSodium OxybateCNS effectsdrug interactionethanolhealthy subjectssodium oxybate

Identifiers

PMID25782469
PMCPMC4574833
OpenAlexW1574785319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.