Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25782422›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2015

Vitamin D3 seems more appropriate than D2 to sustain adequate levels of 25OHD: a pharmacokinetic approach.

B Oliveri, S R Mastaglia, G M Brito, M Seijo, G A Keller, J Somoza, R A Diez, G Di Girolamo

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Vitamin D supplementation after the menopause.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

B OliveriLaboratorio de Enfermedades Metabólicas Óseas, INIGEM-CONICET-UBA, Hospital de Clínicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
S R MastagliaLaboratorio de Enfermedades Metabólicas Óseas, INIGEM-CONICET-UBA, Hospital de Clínicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
G M BritoLaboratorio de Enfermedades Metabólicas Óseas, INIGEM-CONICET-UBA, Hospital de Clínicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
M SeijoLaboratorio de Enfermedades Metabólicas Óseas, INIGEM-CONICET-UBA, Hospital de Clínicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
G A KellerSegunda Cátedra de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J SomozaLaboratorio de Enfermedades Metabólicas Óseas, INIGEM-CONICET-UBA, Hospital de Clínicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
R A DiezSegunda Cátedra de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
G Di GirolamoSegunda Cátedra de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesThe superiority of cholecalciferol (D3) over ergocalciferol (D2) in sustaining serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) levels is controversial. To compare D2 with D3 we performed a single-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial spanning 11 weeks. SUBJECTS/

methodsHealthy volunteers (n=33, aged 33.4±6 years) were divided into three groups (n=11, each): D2, D3 and placebo. Treatment started with a loading dose (100,000 IU) followed by 4800 IU/day (d) between d7 and d20 and follow-up until d77. Serum samples were obtained at baseline and at days 3, 7, 14, 21, 35, 49, 63 and 77.

resultsBaseline 25OHD values in the D2 group were lower than those in the D3 and placebo groups (P<0.01). Placebo 25OHD levels never changed. As after the loading dose both D2 and D3 groups had reached similar 25OHD levels, we tested equivalence of the area under the concentration × time curve (AUC) between d7 and d77. The AUC was 28.6% higher for D3 compared with D2, and both were higher with respect to placebo. At d77, D2 25OHD levels were higher than those at baseline, but similar to placebo; both were lower than D3 (P<0.04). According to raw data, the elimination half-life of 25OHD was 84 and 111 days under D2 and D3 supplementation, respectively; after subtracting the placebo values, the corresponding figures were 33 and 82 days.

conclusionsD2 and D3 were equally effective in elevating 25OHD levels after a loading dose. In the long term, D3 seems more appropriate for sustaining 25OHD, which could be relevant for classic and non-classic effects of vitamin D.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsModels, Biological25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2AdultArgentinaCalcifediolCalciumCholecalciferolErgocalciferolsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHalf-LifeHospitals, UniversityHospitals, UrbanHumansKinetics25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2CalcifediolCalciumCholecalciferolErgocalciferols

Identifiers

PMID25782422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.