Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25781610›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

Bladder recovery by stem cell based cell therapy in the bladder dysfunction induced by spinal cord injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jae Heon Kim, Sung Ryul Shim, Seung Whan Doo, Won Jae Yang, Byung Wook Yoo, Joyce Mary Kim, Young Myoung Ko, Eun Seop Song, Ik Sung Lim, Hong Jun Lee and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Is cell transplantation a reliable therapeutic strategy for spinal cord injury in clinical practice? A systematic review and meta-analysis from 22 clinical controlled trials.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Current status of stem cell therapy in urology.Korean journal of urology · 2015
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jae Heon KimDepartment of Urology, Soonchunyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Ryul ShimInstitute for clinical molecular biology research, Soonchunyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung Whan DooDepartment of Urology, Soonchunyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Won Jae YangDepartment of Urology, Soonchunyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Byung Wook YooDepartment of Family Medicine, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Joyce Mary KimInternational Clinic Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Young Myoung KoDepartment of Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Korea.
Eun Seop SongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Ik Sung LimDepartment of Industrial Management and Engineering, Namseoul University College of Engineering, Cheonan, Korea.
Hong Jun LeeMedical Research Institute, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yun Seob SongDepartment of Urology, Soonchunyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Soonchunhyang University Hospital · KRChung-Ang University · KRInha University · KRNamseoul University · KRPohang University of Science and Technology · KRSoonchunhyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBladder dysfunction induced by spinal cord injury (SCI) can become problematic and severely impair the quality of life. Preclinical studies of spinal cord injury have largely focused on the recovery of limb function while neglecting to investigate bladder recovery.

objectiveThe present study was performed to investigate and review the effect of stem cell-based cell therapy on bladder recovery in SCI.

methodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of urodynamic findings of experimental trials that included studies of stem cell-based cell therapy in SCI. Relevant studies were searched using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library (January 1990 - December 2012). Final inclusion was determined by a urodynamic study involving detailed numerical values. Urodynamic parameters for analysis included voiding pressure, residual urine, bladder capacity and non-voiding contraction (NVC). Meta-analysis of the data, including findings from urodynamic studies, was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

resultsA total of eight studies were included with a sample size of 224 subjects. The studies were divided into different subgroups by different models of SCI. After a stem cell-based cell therapy, voiding pressure (-6.35, p <0.00001, I2 = 77%), NVC (-3.58, p <0.00001, I2 = 82%), residual urine (-024, p = 0.004, I2 = 95%) showed overall significant improvement. Bladder capacity showed improvement after treatment only in the transection type (-0.23, p = 0.0002, I2 = 0%).

conclusionAfter stem cell-based cell therapy in SCI, partial bladder recovery including improvement of voiding pressure, NVC, and residual urine was demonstrated. Additional studies are needed to confirm the detailed mechanism and to obtain an ideal treatment strategy for bladder recovery.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionAnimalsHumansSpinal Cord InjuriesStem Cell TransplantationUrinary Bladder

Identifiers

PMID25781610
PMCPMC4363872
OpenAlexW2067268531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.