Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25781337›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Glycation of nail proteins: from basic biochemical findings to a representative marker for diabetic glycation-associated target organ damage.

Antoine Sadiki Kishabongo, Philippe Katchunga, Elisabeth H Van Aken, Reinhart Speeckaert, Sabrina Lagniau, Renaat Coopman, Marijn M Speeckaert, Joris R Delanghe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. ExploringBiomedical optics express · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. On the nature of toenail opacities in renal insufficiency.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Antoine Sadiki KishabongoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Catholic University of Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Philippe KatchungaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Elisabeth H Van AkenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sint-Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Zottegem, Belgium.
Reinhart SpeeckaertDepartment of Dermatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Sabrina LagniauDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Renaat CoopmanDepartment of Dentistry, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Marijn M SpeeckaertDepartment of Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Joris R DelangheDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BEUniversité Catholique de Bukavu · CD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough assessment of glycated nail proteins may be a useful marker for monitoring of diabetes, their nature and formation are still poorly understood. Besides a detailed anatomical analysis of keratin glycation, the usefulness of glycated nail protein assessment for monitoring diabetic complications was investigated.

methods216 patients (94 males, 122 females; mean age ± standard deviation: 75.0 ± 8.7 years) were enrolled. Glycation of nail and eye lens proteins was assessed using a photometric nitroblue tetrazolium-based assay. Following chromatographic separation of extracted nail proteins, binding and nonbinding fractions were analyzed using one-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Using a hand piece containing a latch-type-bur, a meticulous cutting of the nail plate into superficial and deep layers was performed, followed by a differential analysis of fructosamine.

resultsUsing SDS PAGE, four and two bands were identified among the nonglycated and glycated nail fraction respectively. Significantly lower fructosamine concentrations were found in the superficial nail layer (mean: 2.16 ± 1.37 μmol/g nails) in comparison with the deep layer (mean: 4.36 ± 2.55 μmol/g nails) (P<0.05). A significant higher amount of glycated eye lens proteins was found in diabetes mellitus patients (mean: 3.80 ± 1.57 μmol/g eye lens) in comparison with nondiabetics (mean: 3.35 ± 1.34 μmol/g eye lens) (P<0.05). A marked correlation was found between glycated nail and glycated eye lens proteins [y (glycated nail proteins) = 0.39 + 0.99 x (eye lens glycated proteins); r2 = 0.58, P<0.001]. The concentration of glycated eye lens proteins and the HbA1c level were found to be predictors of the concentration of glycated nail proteins.

conclusionsGlycation of nail proteins takes place in the deep layer of finger nails, which is in close contact with blood vessels and interstitial fluid. Glycation of nail proteins can be regarded as a representative marker for diabetic glycation-associated target organ damage.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCrystallinsDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycation End Products, AdvancedHumansKeratinsLens, CrystallineMaleNailsBiomarkersCrystallinsGlycation End Products, AdvancedKeratins

Identifiers

PMID25781337
PMCPMC4363324
OpenAlexW2033476616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.