Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25781325›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Pelvic belt effects on pelvic morphometry, muscle activity and body balance in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Odette Soisson, Juliane Lube, Andresa Germano, Karl-Heinz Hammer, Christoph Josten, Freddy Sichting, Dirk Winkler, Thomas L Milani, Niels Hammer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03518840 (The Predictive Value of the Active Straight Leg Raise on the Efficacy of a Sacroiliac Joint Belt in Posterior Pelvic Girdle Pain During Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03518840 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The Predictive Value of the Active Straight Leg Raise on the Efficacy of a Sacroiliac Joint Belt in Posterior Pelvic Girdle Pain During Pregnancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorLoyola UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled63ConditionsPelvic Girdle PainArmsSIJ Belt
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Odette SoissonInstitute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany; Institute of Applied Kinesiology, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany; Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Juliane LubeInstitute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Andresa GermanoInstitute of Applied Kinesiology, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Karl-Heinz HammerOrthopedist, Osteologist and Pain Specialist, Kirchberg, Germany.
Christoph JostenDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Freddy SichtingInstitute of Applied Kinesiology, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Dirk WinklerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas L MilaniInstitute of Applied Kinesiology, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Niels HammerInstitute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DEChemnitz University of Technology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is frequently involved in low back and pelvic girdle pain. However, morphometrical and functional characteristics related to SIJ pain are poorly defined. Pelvic belts represent one treatment option, but evidence still lacks as to their pain-reducing effects and the mechanisms involved. Addressing these two issues, this case-controlled study compares morphometric, functional and clinical data in SIJ patients and healthy controls and evaluates the effects of short-term pelvic belt application.

methodsMorphometric and functional data pertaining to pelvic belt effects were compared in 17 SIJ patients and 17 controls. Lumbar spine and pelvis morphometries were obtained from 3T magnetic resonance imaging. Functional electromyography data of pelvis and leg muscles and center of pressure excursions were measured in one-leg stance. The numerical rating scale was used to evaluate immediate pain-reducing effects.

resultsPelvic morphometry was largely unaltered in SIJ patients and also by pelvic belt application. The angle of lumbar lateral flexion was significantly larger in SIJ patients without belt application. Muscle activity and center of pressure were unaffected by SIJ pain or by belt application in one-leg stance. Nine of 17 patients reported decreased pain intensities under moderate belt application, four reported no change and four reported increased pain intensity. For the entire population investigated here, this qualitative description was not confirmed on a statistical significant level. DISCUSSION: Minute changes were observed in the alignment of the lumbar spine in the frontal plane in SIJ patients. The potential pain-decreasing effects of pelvic belts could not be attributed to altered muscle activity, pelvic morphometry or body balance in a static short-term application. Long-term belt effects will therefore be of prospective interest.

Indexed as

BracesPelvisPostural BalanceAdultArthralgiaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMusclesSacroiliac JointTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25781325
PMCPMC4364533
OpenAlexW2095266522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.