Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25780869›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2015

Geriatric patients with cognitive impairment.

Wolfgang von Renteln-Kruse, Lilli Neumann, Björn Klugmann, Andreas Liebetrau, Stefan Golgert, Ulrike Dapp, Birgit Frilling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Perioperative Care of Older Patients.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Geriatric Basics for the Neurohospitalist.The Neurohospitalist · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. [Impact of dementia on length of stay and costs in acute care hospitals].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wolfgang von Renteln-KruseAlbertinen-Haus, Geriatrics Centre, Scientific Department at the University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, Albertinen-Haus, Geriatrics Centre, Scientific Department at the University of Hamburg, Research Department, Hamburg Germany, Albertinen-Hospital, Department of Medical Controlling, Hamburg, Germany.
Lilli Neumann
Björn Klugmann
Andreas Liebetrau
Stefan Golgert
Ulrike Dapp
Birgit Frilling

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospitals are now faced with increasing numbers of cognitively impaired patients aged 80 and older who are at increased risk of treatment complications. This study concerns the outcomes when such patients are treated in a specialized ward for cognitive geriatric medicine.

methodsObservation of a cohort of 2084 patients from 2009 to 2014, supplemented by a sample of 380 patients from the hospital cohort of the Longitudinal Urban Cohort Ageing Study (LUCAS) for the years 2010 and 2011.

resultsGeriatric inpatients with cognitive impairment tend to be multimorbid. Half of the patients studied (1031 of 2084 patients) were admitted to the hospital on an emergency basis. Complications arising on the ward that necessitated transfer elsewhere arose in 2.6% (51 of 2084 patients). Moreover, analysis of the sample of 380 patients from the LUCAS cohort revealed that the treatments they underwent during hospitalization were associated with an improvement of their functional state: their mean overall score on the Barthel index rose from 39.8 ± 24.3 (median, 35) on admission to 52.7 ± 27.0 (median, 55) on discharge. The percentage of patients being treated with 5 or more drugs fell from 98.2% (373/380) on admission to 79.3% (314/362) on discharge. The percentage receiving potentially inappropriate medications (PIM), as defined by the PRISCUS list, fell from 45% to 13.3%, while the percentage of drug orders and prescriptions involving PIM fell from 7.8 % (327/4181) to 2.0% (53/2600). 70% of the patients were discharged to the same living situation where they had been before admission.

conclusionIn this study, structured geriatric treatment in a cohort of older acutely ill patients with cognitive impairment was associated with improvement of functions that are relevant to everyday life, as well as with a reduction of polypharmacy. Controlled studies are needed to confirm the observed benefit.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overCognition DisordersComorbidityFemaleFractures, BoneGermanyHealth Services for the AgedHumansMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25780869
PMCPMC4353868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.