Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25780628›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2015

Development of a hemodialysis safety checklist using a structured panel process.

Samuel A Silver, Alison Thomas, Andrea Rathe, Pamela Robinson, Ron Wald, Ziv Harel, Chaim M Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel A SilverDivision of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Alison ThomasDivision of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Andrea RatheDivision of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Pamela RobinsonDivision of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Ron WaldDivision of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Ziv Harel *Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Chaim M Bell *Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization created a Surgical Safety Checklist with a pause or "time out" to help reduce preventable adverse events and improve communication. A similar tool might improve patient safety and reduce treatment-associated morbidity in the hemodialysis unit.

objectiveTo develop a Hemodialysis Safety Checklist (Hemo Pause) for daily use by nurses and patients.

designA modified Delphi consensus technique based on the RAND method was used to evaluate and revise the checklist.

settingUniversity-affiliated in-center hemodialysis unit.

participantsA multidisciplinary team of physicians, nurses, and administrators developed the initial version of the Hemo Pause Checklist. The evaluation team consisted of 20 registered hemodialysis nurses. MEASUREMENTS: The top 5 hemodialysis safety measures according to hemodialysis nurses. A 75% agreement threshold was required for consensus.

methodsThe structured panel process was iterative, consisting of a literature review to identify safety parameters, individual rating of each parameter by the panel of hemodialysis nurses, an in-person consensus meeting wherein the panel refined the parameters, and a final anonymous survey that assessed panel consensus.

resultsThe literature review produced 31 patient safety parameters. Individual review by panelists reduced the list to 25 parameters, followed by further reduction to 19 at the in-person consensus meeting. The final round of scoring yielded the following top 5 safety measures: 1) confirmation of patient identity, 2) measurement of pre-dialysis weight, 3) recognition and transcription of new medical orders, 4) confirmation of dialysate composition based on prescription, and 5) measurement of pre-dialysis blood pressure. Revision using human factors principles incorporated the 19 patient safety parameters with greater than or equal to 75% consensus into a final checklist of 17-items. LIMITATIONS: The literature review was not systematic. This was a single-center study, and the panel lacked patient and family representation.

conclusionsA novel 17-item Hemodialysis Safety Checklist (Hemo Pause) for use by nurses and patients has been developed to standardize the hemodialysis procedure. Further quality improvement efforts are underway to explore the feasibility of using this checklist to reduce adverse events and strengthen the safety culture in the hemodialysis unit.

Indexed as

ChecklistDelphi panelHemodialysisPatient safetyQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID25780628
PMCPMC4349476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.