Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25780587›Full record

ArticleBasic and clinical andrology2014

Man is not a big rat: concerns with traditional human risk assessment of phthalates based on their anti-androgenic effects observed in the rat foetus.

René Habert, Gabriel Livera, Virginie Rouiller-Fabre

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Basic and clinical andrology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Xenotransplantation models to study the effects of toxicants on human fetal tissues.Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

René HabertSorbonne Paris Cité, Laboratory of Development of the Gonads, Unit of Stem Cells and Radiation, University Paris Diderot, BP 6, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France ; CEA, DSV, iRCM, SCSR, LDG, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France ; INSERM, Unité 967, F-92265 Fontenay aux Roses, France ; Stem Cells and Radiation Unit, LDG / SCSR / iRCM / DSV, Centre CEA, BP6, F-92265 Fontenay aux Roses, France.
Gabriel LiveraSorbonne Paris Cité, Laboratory of Development of the Gonads, Unit of Stem Cells and Radiation, University Paris Diderot, BP 6, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France ; CEA, DSV, iRCM, SCSR, LDG, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France ; INSERM, Unité 967, F-92265 Fontenay aux Roses, France.
Virginie Rouiller-FabreSorbonne Paris Cité, Laboratory of Development of the Gonads, Unit of Stem Cells and Radiation, University Paris Diderot, BP 6, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France ; CEA, DSV, iRCM, SCSR, LDG, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France ; INSERM, Unité 967, F-92265 Fontenay aux Roses, France.
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phthalates provide one of the most documented example evidencing how much we must be cautious when using the traditional paradigm based on extrapolation of experimental data from rodent studies for human health risk assessment of endocrine disruptors (EDs). Since foetal testis is known as one of the most sensitive targets of EDs, phthalate risk assessment is routinely based on the capacity of such compounds to decrease testosterone production by the testis or to impair masculinization in the rat during foetal life. In this paper, the well-established inhibiting effects of phthalates of the foetal Leydig cells function in the rat are briefly reviewed. Then, data obtained in humans and other species are carefully analysed. Already in January 2009, using the organotypic culture system named Fetal Testis Assay (FeTA) that we developed, we reported that phthalates might not affect testosterone production in human foetal testes. Several recent experimental studies using xenografts confirm the absence of detectable anti-androgenic effect of phthalates in the human foetal testes. Epidemiological studies led to contradictory results. Altogether, these findings suggest that phthalates effects on foetal Leydig cells are largely species-specific. Consequently, the phthalate threshold doses that disturb foetal steroidogenesis in rat testes and that are presently used to define the acceptable daily intake levels for human health protection must be questioned. This does not mean that phthalates are safe because these compounds have many deleterious effects upon germ cell development that may be common to the different studied species including human. More generally, the identification of common molecular, cellular or/and phenotypic targets in rat and human testes should precede the choice of the toxicological endpoint in rat to accurately assess the safety threshold of any ED in humans.

Indexed as

DevelopmentEndocrine disruptorsFoetusHuman healthLeydig cellsMasculinizationPhthalatesReproductionRisk assessmentTestisTestosteroneToxicity test

Identifiers

PMID25780587
PMCPMC4349750
OpenAlexW1964211721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.