ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2015
Comparison of droplet digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Application of the conventional and novel methods in testing EGFR variants for NSCLC patients in the last 10 years through different regions: a systematic review.Molecular biology reports · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Detection ofBiomolecules · 2021Trial
- Liquid biopsy: current applications and future directions.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial base mismatches-mediated PCR (ABM-PCR) for detecting clinically relevant single-base mutations.Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- Liquid biopsies in cancer.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- HBX Multi-Mutations Combined With Traditional Screening Indicators to Establish a Nomogram Contributes to Precisely Stratify the High-Risk Population of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Application of plasma cell-free DNA in screening of advanced colorectal adenoma.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Blood-based biomarkers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: developments over the last decade and what holds for the future- a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Rapid and Sensitive Digital Droplet PCR Assays for Detecting HPV16 DNA in Liquid Biopsies.Journal of medical virology · 2025Article
- Circulating tumor DNA in cholangiocarcinoma: current clinical applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Detection of PIK3CA hotspot mutations in canine mammary tumors using droplet digital PCR: tissue validation and liquid biopsy feasibility.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Optimizing ctDNA: An Updated Review of a Promising Clinical Tool for the Management of Uveal Melanoma.Cancers · 2024Review
- Non-invasive prenatal test identifies circulating cell-free DNA chromosomal abnormalities derived from clonal hematopoiesis in aggressive hematological malignancies.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Article
- Liquid Biopsy: A Game Changer for Type 2 Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Liquid biopsy in T-cell lymphoma: biomarker detection techniques and clinical application.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Clinical applications and utility of ctDNA in cervical cancer and its precursor lesions: from screening to predictive biomarker.Cancer cell international · 2023Review
- Liquid Biopsies, Novel Approaches and Future Directions.Cancers · 2023Review
- Digital polymerase chain reaction strategies for accurate and precise detection of vector copy number in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell products.Cytotherapy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.