Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25779948›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2015

Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients within a Randomized, Phase II Trial: TBCRC 019.

Costanza Paoletti, Yufeng Li, Maria C Muñiz, Kelley M Kidwell, Kimberly Aung, Dafydd G Thomas, Martha E Brown, Vandana G Abramson, William J Irvin, Nancy U Lin and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Label-Free Microfluidic Apheresis of Circulating Tumor Cell Clusters.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Mechanisms of breast cancer metastasis.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Collective metastasis: coordinating the multicellular voyage.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Costanza PaolettiComprehensive Cancer Center and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health and Hospital System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Yufeng LiUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Maria C MuñizComprehensive Cancer Center and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health and Hospital System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kelley M KidwellComprehensive Cancer Center and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health and Hospital System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Univeristy of Michigan, Department of Biostatistics, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kimberly AungComprehensive Cancer Center and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health and Hospital System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Dafydd G ThomasComprehensive Cancer Center and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health and Hospital System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Martha E BrownComprehensive Cancer Center and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health and Hospital System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Vandana G AbramsonVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
William J IrvinUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, Virginia.
Nancy U LinDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Minetta C LiuGeorgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Rita NandaUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Julie R NangiaBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Anna M StornioloIndiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Tiffany A TrainaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Christos VaklavasUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Catherine H Van PoznakComprehensive Cancer Center and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health and Hospital System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Antonio C WolffJohns Hopkins Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Andres Forero-TorresUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Daniel F HayesComprehensive Cancer Center and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health and Hospital System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. hayesdf@umich.edu.
Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC)
University Health System · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USBaylor College of Medicine · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USGeorgetown University · USIndiana University Health · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCirculating tumor cells (CTC) are prognostic in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We tested whether EpCAM-based capture system (CellSearch) is effective in patients with triple-negative (TN) MBC, and whether CTC apoptosis and clustering enhances the prognostic role of CTC. EXPERIMENTAL

designCTC enumeration and apoptosis were determined using the CXC CellSearch kit at baseline and days 15 and 29 in blood drawn from TN MBC patients who participated in a prospective randomized phase II trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) with or without tigatuzumab. Association between levels of CTC and patient outcomes was assessed using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

resultsNineteen of 52 (36.5%), 14 of 52 (26.9%), and 13 of 49 (26.5%) patients who were evaluable had elevated CTC (≥5 CTC/7.5 mL whole blood) at baseline and at days 15 and 29, respectively. Patients with elevated versus not elevated CTC at each time point had worse progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.005, 0.0003, 0.0002, respectively). The odds of clinical benefit response for those who had elevated versus low CTC at baseline and days 15 and 29 were 0.25 (95% CI: 0.08-0.84; P = 0.024), 0.19 (95% CI: 0.05-0.17; P = 0.014), and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01-0.33; P = 0.001), respectively. There was no apparent prognostic effect comparing CTC apoptosis versus non-apoptosis. Presence of CTC cluster at day 15 and day 29 was associated with shorter PFS.

conclusionsCTC were detected using CellSearch assay in approximately one-third of TN MBC patients. Elevated CTC at baseline and days 15 and 29 were prognostic, and reductions in CTC levels reflected response.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlbuminsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorCell CountFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPaclitaxelPrognosisTriple Negative Breast Neoplasms130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkers, TumorPaclitaxeltigatuzumab

Identifiers

PMID25779948
PMCPMC5521206
OpenAlexW2159232758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.