Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25779513›Full record

ReviewJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2015

Biofabricated constructs as tissue models: a short review.

Pedro F Costa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pedro F CostaInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technical University of Munich, Trogerstr. 30, 81675, Munich, Germany, pedro.costa@tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofabrication is currently able to provide reliable models for studying the development of cells and tissues into multiple environments. As the complexity of biofabricated constructs is becoming increasingly higher their ability to closely mimic native tissues and organs is also increasing. Various biofabrication technologies currently allow to precisely build cell/tissue constructs at multiple dimension ranges with great accuracy. Such technologies are also able to assemble together multiple types of cells and/or materials and generate constructs closely mimicking various types of tissues. Furthermore, the high degree of automation involved in these technologies enables the study of large arrays of testing conditions within increasingly smaller and automated devices both in vitro and in vivo. Despite not yet being able to generate constructs similar to complex tissues and organs, biofabrication is rapidly evolving in that direction. One major hurdle to be overcome in order for such level of complex detail to be achieved is the ability to generate complex vascular structures within biofabricated constructs. This review describes several of the most relevant technologies and methodologies currently utilized within biofabrication and provides as well a brief overview of their current and future potential applications.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsBatch Cell Culture TechniquesBiocompatible MaterialsBiomimeticsHumansMalePrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.