Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25779383›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2015

Immunological failure of first-line and switch to second-line antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected persons in Tanzania: analysis of routinely collected national data.

Fiona M Vanobberghen, Bonita Kilama, Alison Wringe, Angela Ramadhani, Basia Zaba, Donan Mmbando, Jim Todd

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fiona M VanobberghenLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Bonita KilamaNational AIDS Control Program, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Alison WringeLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Angela RamadhaniNational AIDS Control Program, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Basia ZabaLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Donan MmbandoMinistry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Jim ToddLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMinistry of Health and Social Welfare · TZ

Funding

Medical Research Council G0902143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRates of first-line treatment failure and switches to second-line therapy are key indicators for national HIV programmes. We assessed immunological treatment failure defined by WHO criteria in the Tanzanian national HIV programme.

methodsWe included adults initiating first-line therapy in 2004-2011 with a pre-treatment CD4 count, and ≥6-months of follow-up. We assessed subhazard ratios (SHR) for immunological treatment failure, and subsequent switch to second-line therapy, using competing risks methods to account for deaths.

resultsOf 121 308 adults, 7% experienced immunological treatment failure, and 2% died without observed immunological treatment failure, over a median 1.7 years. The 6-year cumulative probability of immunological treatment failure was 19.0% (95% CI 18.5, 19.7) and of death, 5.1% (4.8, 5.4). Immunological treatment failure predictors included earlier year of treatment initiation (P < 0.001), initiation in lower level facilities (SHR = 2.23 [2.03, 2.45] for dispensaries vs. hospitals), being male (1.27 [1.19, 1.33]) and initiation at low or high CD4 counts (for example, 1.78 [1.65, 1.92] and 5.33 [4.65, 6.10] for <50 and ≥500 vs. 200-349 cells/mm(3) , respectively). Of 7382 participants in the time-to-switch analysis, 6% switched and 5% died before switching. Four years after immunological treatment failure, the cumulative probability of switching was 7.3% (6.6, 8.0) and of death, 6.8% (6.0, 7.6). Those who immunologically failed in dispensaries, health centres and government facilities were least likely to switch.

conclusionsImmunological treatment failure rates and unmet need for second-line therapy are high in Tanzania; virological monitoring, at least for persons with immunological treatment failure, is required to minimise unnecessary switches to second-line therapy. Lower level government health facilities need more support to reduce treatment failure rates and improve second-line therapy uptake to sustain the benefits of increased coverage.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedTanzaniaTreatment FailureViral LoadYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsadultadulteAdultoantiretroviral therapyCD4 lymphocyte countéchec du traitementfacteurs de risquefactores de riesgofallo terapéuticonumération des lymphocytes CD4risk factorsTanzaniaTanzanieterapia antirretroviral, conteo de linfocitos CD4thérapie antirétroviraletreatment failure

Identifiers

PMID25779383
PMCPMC4672690
OpenAlexW2040417861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.