Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25779349›Full record

ArticleeLife2015

Conservation of transcription factor binding specificities across 600 million years of bilateria evolution.

Kazuhiro R Nitta, Arttu Jolma, Yimeng Yin, Ekaterina Morgunova, Teemu Kivioja, Junaid Akhtar, Korneel Hens, Jarkko Toivonen, Bart Deplancke, Eileen E M Furlong and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 170 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
170citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

170 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 407 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. UnlockingNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Kazuhiro R NittaDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Arttu JolmaDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Yimeng YinDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ekaterina MorgunovaDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Teemu KiviojaGenome-Scale Biology Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Junaid AkhtarGenome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Korneel HensInstitute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jarkko ToivonenDepartment of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Bart DeplanckeInstitute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Eileen E M FurlongGenome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jussi TaipaleDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
University of Helsinki · FIKarolinska Institutet · SEÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DE

Funding

Wellcome Trust 090309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Divergent morphology of species has largely been ascribed to genetic differences in the tissue-specific expression of proteins, which could be achieved by divergence in cis-regulatory elements or by altering the binding specificity of transcription factors (TFs). The relative importance of the latter has been difficult to assess, as previous systematic analyses of TF binding specificity have been performed using different methods in different species. To address this, we determined the binding specificities of 242 Drosophila TFs, and compared them to human and mouse data. This analysis revealed that TF binding specificities are highly conserved between Drosophila and mammals, and that for orthologous TFs, the similarity extends even to the level of very subtle dinucleotide binding preferences. The few human TFs with divergent specificities function in cell types not found in fruit flies, suggesting that evolution of TF specificities contributes to emergence of novel types of differentiated cells.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBinding SitesDrosophilaGene DuplicationHumansMicePhylogenySELEX Aptamer TechniqueSequence Homology, Amino AcidTranscription FactorsTranscription FactorschromosomesD. melanogasterDNA binding specificityevolutionary biologyevolutionary conservationgenesgenomicsHT-SELEXhumantranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID25779349
PMCPMC4362205
OpenAlexW2170964754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.