ArticleErgonomics2015
Application of participatory ergonomics to the redesign of the family-centred rounds process.
Article in Ergonomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02625142 (Engaging Families in Bedside Rounds to Promote Pediatric Patient Safety), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Engaging Families in Bedside Rounds to Promote Pediatric Patient Safety
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Family-Centered Rounds Checklist, Family Engagement, and Patient Safety: A Randomized Trial.Pediatrics · 2017Trial
- Team FIRST: an innovative educational strategy for teaching teamwork competencies to medical students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Practical strategies for improving medication management during care transitions for older adults with dementia: findings from a novel stakeholder-informed review process.Age and ageing · 2025Article
- Engineering Safe Care Journeys: Designing a Patient Safety Passport.Journal of patient safety · 2025Article
- The decision aid is the easy part: workflow challenges of shared decision making in cancer care.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Human Factors Engineering for the Pediatric Hospitalist.Hospital pediatrics · 2023Article
- Application of Participatory Ergonomics to the Dissemination of a Quality Improvement Program for Optimizing Blood Culture Use.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2023Article
- Evaluating the Usability of an Emergency Department After Visit Summary: Staged Heuristic Evaluation.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- SEIPS 101 and seven simple SEIPS tools.BMJ quality & safety · 2021Review
- Disparate perspectives: Exploring healthcare professionals' misaligned mental models of older adults' transitions of care between the emergency department and skilled nursing facility.Applied ergonomics · 2021Article
- Implementation of An Antibiotic Stewardship Intervention to Reduce Prescription of Fluoroquinolones: A Human Factors Analysis in Two Intensive Care Units.Journal of patient safety and risk management · 2021Article
- Decreasing ICU-associatedBMJ open · 2021Article
- Medical Device Workarounds in Providing Care for Children With Medical Complexity in the Home.Pediatrics · 2021Article
- Targeted gown and glove use to preventInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2021Article
- Engaging Patients and Caregivers in a Transdisciplinary Effort to Improve Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.Open forum infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Optimizing the Physical Clinical Learning Environment for Teaching.Journal of graduate medical education · 2020Article
- SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety.Applied ergonomics · 2020Article
- Applying participatory design to a pharmacy system intervention.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2019Article
- Implementation of a Clostridioides difficile prevention bundle: Understanding common, unique, and conflicting work system barriers and facilitators for subprocess design.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2019Article
- Developing interventions to improve health: a systematic mapping review of international practice between 2015 and 2016.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Participatory ergonomics (PE) can promote the application of human factors and ergonomics (HFE) principles to healthcare system redesign. This study applied a PE approach to redesigning the family-centred rounds (FCR) process to improve family engagement. Various FCR stakeholders (e.g. patients and families, physicians, nurses, hospital management) were involved in different stages of the PE process. HFE principles were integrated in both the content (e.g. shared mental model, usability, workload consideration, systems approach) and process (e.g. top management commitment, stakeholder participation, communication and feedback, learning and training, project management) of FCR redesign. We describe activities of the PE process (e.g. formation and meetings of the redesign team, data collection activities, intervention development, intervention implementation) and present data on PE process evaluation. To demonstrate the value of PE-based FCR redesign, future research should document its impact on FCR process measures (e.g. family engagement, round efficiency) and patient outcome measures (e.g. patient satisfaction).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.