Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25775937›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2015

An adaptive MR-CT registration method for MRI-guided prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Hualiang Zhong, Ning Wen, James J Gordon, Mohamed A Elshaikh, Benjamin Movsas, Indrin J Chetty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2017
    Trial
  3. Converting from CT- to MRI-only-based target definition in radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer: A comparison between two modalities.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2015
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Applicability and usage of dose mapping/accumulation in radiotherapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hualiang ZhongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Ning WenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
James J GordonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Mohamed A ElshaikhDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Benjamin MovsasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Indrin J ChettyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Henry Ford Health System · US

Funding

To quantify deformable image registration errors in IGRTR01CA140341 · NCI · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ZHONG, HUALIANG · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance images (MRI) have superior soft tissue contrast compared with CT images. Therefore, MRI might be a better imaging modality to differentiate the prostate from surrounding normal organs. Methods to accurately register MRI to simulation CT images are essential, as we transition the use of MRI into the routine clinic setting. In this study, we present a finite element method (FEM) to improve the performance of a commercially available, B-spline-based registration algorithm in the prostate region. Specifically, prostate contours were delineated independently on ten MRI and CT images using the Eclipse treatment planning system. Each pair of MRI and CT images was registered with the B-spline-based algorithm implemented in the VelocityAI system. A bounding box that contains the prostate volume in the CT image was selected and partitioned into a tetrahedral mesh. An adaptive finite element method was then developed to adjust the displacement vector fields (DVFs) of the B-spline-based registrations within the box. The B-spline and FEM-based registrations were evaluated based on the variations of prostate volume and tumor centroid, the unbalanced energy of the generated DVFs, and the clarity of the reconstructed anatomical structures. The results showed that the volumes of the prostate contours warped with the B-spline-based DVFs changed 10.2% on average, relative to the volumes of the prostate contours on the original MR images. This discrepancy was reduced to 1.5% for the FEM-based DVFs. The average unbalanced energy was 2.65 and 0.38 mJ cm(-3), and the prostate centroid deviation was 0.37 and 0.28 cm, for the B-spline and FEM-based registrations, respectively. Different from the B-spline-warped MR images, the FEM-warped MR images have clear boundaries between prostates and bladders, and their internal prostatic structures are consistent with those of the original MR images. In summary, the developed adaptive FEM method preserves the prostate volume during the transformation between the MR and CT images and improves the accuracy of the B-spline registrations in the prostate region. The approach will be valuable for the development of high-quality MRI-guided radiation therapy.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsFinite Element AnalysisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, StatisticalMultimodal ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedUrinary Bladder

Identifiers

PMID25775937
PMCPMC4386880
OpenAlexW2065025150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.