Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25775505›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental health perspectives2015

Bisphenol S and F: A Systematic Review and Comparison of the Hormonal Activity of Bisphenol A Substitutes.

Johanna R Rochester, Ashley L Bolden

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental health perspectives, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 457 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
457citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
54.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

457 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,459 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Endocrine Disruptors and Gynecological Malignancies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

397 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johanna R RochesterThe Endocrine Disruption Exchange (TEDX), Paonia, Colorado, USA.
Ashley L Bolden
T1D Exchange · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing concern over bisphenol A (BPA) as an endocrine-disrupting chemical and its possible effects on human health have prompted the removal of BPA from consumer products, often labeled "BPA-free." Some of the chemical replacements, however, are also bisphenols and may have similar physiological effects in organisms. Bisphenol S (BPS) and bisphenol F (BPF) are two such BPA substitutes.

objectivesThis review was carried out to evaluate the physiological effects and endocrine activities of the BPA substitutes BPS and BPF. Further, we compared the hormonal potency of BPS and BPF to that of BPA.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review based on the Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) protocol.

resultsWe identified the body of literature to date, consisting of 32 studies (25 in vitro only, and 7 in vivo). The majority of these studies examined the hormonal activities of BPS and BPF and found their potency to be in the same order of magnitude and of similar action as BPA (estrogenic, antiestrogenic, androgenic, and antiandrogenic) in vitro and in vivo. BPS also has potencies similar to that of estradiol in membrane-mediated pathways, which are important for cellular actions such as proliferation, differentiation, and death. BPS and BPF also showed other effects in vitro and in vivo, such as altered organ weights, reproductive end points, and enzyme expression.

conclusionsBased on the current literature, BPS and BPF are as hormonally active as BPA, and they have endocrine-disrupting effects. CITATION: Rochester JR, Bolden AL. 2015. Bisphenol S and F: a systematic review and comparison of the hormonal activity of bisphenol A substitutes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzhydryl CompoundsBisphenol A CompoundsBisphenol S CompoundsEndocrine DisruptorsHumansPhenolsSulfonesBenzhydryl Compoundsbisphenol ABisphenol A Compoundsbisphenol SBisphenol S CompoundsEndocrine DisruptorsPhenolsSulfones

Identifiers

PMID25775505
PMCPMC4492270
OpenAlexW2006104250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.