Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25775472›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2015

Generic switching and non-persistence among medicine users: a combined population-based questionnaire and register study.

Jette Rathe, Morten Andersen, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl, René dePont Christensen, Jesper Hallas, Jens Søndergaard

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Influencers of generic drug utilization: A systematic review.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The National Library of Medicine Pill Image Recognition Challenge: An Initial Report.IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop : [proceedings]. IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jette RatheResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Morten AndersenCentre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medicine Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Dorte Ejg JarbølResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
René dePont ChristensenResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jesper HallasResearch Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jens SøndergaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneric substitution means that one medicinal product is replaced by another product containing the same active substance. It is strictly regulated with respect to its bioequivalence, and all products must have undergone appropriate studies. Although generic substitution is widely implemented, it still remains to be answered how generic switch influences persistence to long-term treatment, and if it is modified by patients' concerns about medicine and views on generic medicine. This study focuses on users of antidepressants and antiepileptics, and their experience of generic switching.

methodsThe study was an observational cohort study. By use of a prescription database, we identified patients who had redeemed prescriptions on generically substitutable drugs, and a questionnaire was mailed to them. We analyzed predictors of discontinuation in relation to generic switch and patients' attitudes towards generic medicines and concerns about their medicine.

resultsPatients who experience their first-time switch of a specific drug were at higher risk of non-persistence, Hazard Ratio 2.98, 95% CI (1.81;4.89) versus those who have never switched, and 35.7% became non-persistent during the first year of follow-up. Generic switching did not influence persistence considerably in those having previous experience with generic switching of the specific drug. Stratified analyses on users of antidepressants and antiepileptics underpin the results, showing higher risk of non-persistence for first-time switchers for both drug categories.

conclusionIn conclusion, patients who are first-time switchers of a specific drug were at higher risk of non-persistence compared to never switchers and those having experienced previous generic switching.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsDenmarkDrugs, GenericDrug SubstitutionFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceRegistriesTherapeutic EquivalencyYoung AdultAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsDrugs, Generic

Identifiers

PMID25775472
PMCPMC4361595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.