Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25775046›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Determination of variation parameters as a crucial step in designing TMT-based clinical proteomics experiments.

Evelyne Maes, Dirk Valkenborg, Geert Baggerman, Hanny Willems, Bart Landuyt, Liliane Schoofs, Inge Mertens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Proteome Profiling of Developing Murine Lens Through Mass Spectrometry.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Evelyne MaesFlemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium; CFP-CeProMa, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; KU Leuven, Research Group of Functional Genomics and Proteomics, Leuven, Belgium.
Dirk ValkenborgFlemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium; CFP-CeProMa, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Geert BaggermanFlemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium; CFP-CeProMa, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Hanny WillemsFlemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium; CFP-CeProMa, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bart LanduytKU Leuven, Research Group of Functional Genomics and Proteomics, Leuven, Belgium.
Liliane SchoofsKU Leuven, Research Group of Functional Genomics and Proteomics, Leuven, Belgium.
Inge MertensFlemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium; CFP-CeProMa, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Flemish Institute for Technological Research · BEKU Leuven · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In quantitative shotgun proteomic analyses by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry, a rigid study design is necessary in order to obtain statistically relevant results. Hypothesis testing, sample size calculation and power estimation are fundamental concepts that require consideration upon designing an experiment. For this reason, the reproducibility and variability of the proteomic platform needs to be assessed. In this study, we evaluate the technical (sample preparation), labeling (isobaric labels), and total (biological + technical + labeling + experimental) variability and reproducibility of a workflow that employs a shotgun LC-MS/MS approach in combination with TMT peptide labeling for the quantification of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) proteome. We illustrate that the variability induced by TMT labeling is small when compared to the technical variation. The latter is also responsible for a substantial part of the total variation. Prior knowledge about the experimental variability allows for a correct design, a prerequisite for the detection of biologically significant disease-specific differential proteins in clinical proteomics experiments.

Indexed as

Tandem Mass SpectrometryCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearMaleMiddle AgedPeptidesPilot ProjectsProteomeProteomicsPeptidesProteome

Identifiers

PMID25775046
PMCPMC4361338
OpenAlexW2015622779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.