Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25775042›Full record

ArticleNature methods2015

Direct visualization of newly synthesized target proteins in situ.

Susanne tom Dieck, Lisa Kochen, Cyril Hanus, Maximilian Heumüller, Ina Bartnik, Belquis Nassim-Assir, Katrin Merk, Thorsten Mosler, Sakshi Garg, Stefanie Bunse and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 184 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
184citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

184 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The Neuronal Golgi Network and Its Acolytes.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

124 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Susanne tom DieckSynaptic Plasticity Department, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Lisa KochenSynaptic Plasticity Department, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Cyril HanusSynaptic Plasticity Department, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Maximilian HeumüllerSynaptic Plasticity Department, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ina BartnikSynaptic Plasticity Department, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Belquis Nassim-AssirSynaptic Plasticity Department, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Katrin MerkSynaptic Plasticity Department, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Thorsten MoslerSynaptic Plasticity Department, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sakshi GargSynaptic Plasticity Department, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Stefanie BunseSynaptic Plasticity Department, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
David A TirrellDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Erin M SchumanSynaptic Plasticity Department, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

NEW AMINO ACIDS FOR PROTEIN ENGINEERINGR01GM062523 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI TIRRELL, DAVID A · 2001 to 2013
$3.6M
European Research Council 294376NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein synthesis is a dynamic process that tunes the cellular proteome in response to internal and external demands. Metabolic labeling approaches identify the general proteomic response but cannot visualize specific newly synthesized proteins within cells. Here we describe a technique that couples noncanonical amino acid tagging or puromycylation with the proximity ligation assay to visualize specific newly synthesized proteins and monitor their origin, redistribution and turnover in situ.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesCells, CulturedFibroblastsGene Expression RegulationHippocampusMiceNeuronsProteinsRatsStaining and LabelingAntibodiesProteins

Identifiers

PMID25775042
PMCPMC4414919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.