Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25774834›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2015

Force transmission during adhesion-independent migration.

Martin Bergert, Anna Erzberger, Ravi A Desai, Irene M Aspalter, Andrew C Oates, Guillaume Charras, Guillaume Salbreux, Ewa K Paluch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 174 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Harnessing the Power ofCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Bleb expansion requires transient membrane invaginations that sequester curvature-preferring proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Chemical and Mechanical Regulation of Leukocyte Migration.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Statistical and mechanical analysis of multi-pseudopodial locomotion in a testate amoeba, Arcella sp.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin Bergert1] MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, UCL, London WC1E 6BT, UK [2] Institute for the Physics of Living Systems, UCL, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Anna ErzbergerMax Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden 01187, Germany.
Ravi A Desai1] Institute for the Physics of Living Systems, UCL, London WC1E 6BT, UK [2] MRC National Institute for Medical Research, London NW7 1AA, UK [3] Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, UCL, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Irene M Aspalter1] MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, UCL, London WC1E 6BT, UK [2] Institute for the Physics of Living Systems, UCL, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Andrew C Oates1] Institute for the Physics of Living Systems, UCL, London WC1E 6BT, UK [2] MRC National Institute for Medical Research, London NW7 1AA, UK [3] Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, UCL, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Guillaume Charras1] Institute for the Physics of Living Systems, UCL, London WC1E 6BT, UK [2] London Centre for Nanotechnology and Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, UCL, London WC1H 0AH, UK.
Guillaume SalbreuxMax Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden 01187, Germany.
Ewa K Paluch1] MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, UCL, London WC1E 6BT, UK [2] Institute for the Physics of Living Systems, UCL, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_1202/3Medical Research Council MC_UP_1205/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12018/5Wellcome Trust 098025Wellcome Trust WT098025MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When cells move using integrin-based focal adhesions, they pull in the direction of motion with large, ∼100 Pa, stresses that contract the substrate. Integrin-mediated adhesions, however, are not required for in vivo confined migration. During focal adhesion-free migration, the transmission of propelling forces, and their magnitude and orientation, are not understood. Here, we combine theory and experiments to investigate the forces involved in adhesion-free migration. Using a non-adherent blebbing cell line as a model, we show that actin cortex flows drive cell movement through nonspecific substrate friction. Strikingly, the forces propelling the cell forward are several orders of magnitude lower than during focal-adhesion-based motility. Moreover, the force distribution in adhesion-free migration is inverted: it acts to expand, rather than contract, the substrate in the direction of motion. This fundamentally different mode of force transmission may have implications for cell-cell and cell-substrate interactions during migration in vivo.

Indexed as

Stress, MechanicalActinsAnimalsCarcinoma 256, WalkerCell AdhesionCell Line, TumorCell MovementFrictionIntegrinsRatsActinsIntegrins

Identifiers

PMID25774834
PMCPMC6485532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.