Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25774744›Full record

ArticleJournal of addictive diseases2015

Formal and informal organizational activities of people who inject drugs in New York City: description and correlates.

Samuel R Friedman, Enrique R Pouget, Milagros Sandoval, Yolanda Jones, Pedro Mateu-Gelabert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of addictive diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Socioenvironmental disasters and the dialectics of overdose mortality.The International journal on drug policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Historical and theoretical roots of the big events framework.The International journal on drug policy · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel R Friedmana National Development and Research Institutes , New York , New York , USA.
Enrique R Pouget
Milagros Sandoval
Yolanda Jones
Pedro Mateu-Gelabert

Funding

Transdisciplinary Theoretical Svnthesis and Development CoreP30DA011041 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Holly Hagan · 1998 to 2026
$38.9M
Developing measures to study how structural interventions may affect HIV riskR01DA031597 · NIDA · NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI FRIEDMAN, SAMUEL R, POUGET, ENRIQUE RODRIGUEZ · 2011 to 2015
$2.1M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA011041NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031597NIDA NIH HHS R01DA031597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about group memberships of people who inject drugs (PWID). Three hundred PWID were interviewed about formal and informal group participation and risk behaviors. Many took part in groups related to problems and resources associated with injecting drugs, religion, sports or gender. Harm reduction group and support group participation was associated with less risk behavior; sports groups participation with more risk behavior. Group involvement by PWID may be important to their lives and/or affect prevention or infectious disease transmission. More research is needed about determinants and consequences of their and other drug users' group memberships.

Indexed as

Peer GroupRisk-TakingSocial SupportAdultAge DistributionBlack or African AmericanFemaleHarm ReductionHumansInterviews as TopicLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeedle SharingNew York CityRisk Reduction BehaviorBig EventsDrug usersgroup membershipHIVinjection drug users (IDUs)people who inject drugsrisk behaviorsstructural interventions

Identifiers

PMID25774744
PMCPMC4400192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.