Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25774382›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in psychology2015

Thriving through relationships.

Brooke C Feeney, Nancy L Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Starting the conversation: A new path in suicide prevention.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A narrative review of mechanisms linking romantic relationship experiences to sleep quality.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brooke C FeeneyCarnegie Mellon University, United States.
Nancy L CollinsUniversity of California, Santa Barbara, United States.

Funding

Social Behaviors and Thriving in Older AdulthoodR01AG032370 · NIA · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI FEENEY, BROOKE C · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG032370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The specific pathways through which close relationships promote optimal well-being are not well understood. We describe a model (building on attachment theory's notion of safe haven and secure base support) that explains how close relationships promote thriving. This model defines thriving, identifies distinct contexts through which individuals may thrive (life adversity and life opportunities for growth), describes two distinct social support functions in close relationships that promote thriving (source of strength support and relational catalyst support), and identifies mediators through which relational support leads to long-term thriving.

Identifiers

PMID25774382
PMCPMC4356946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.