Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25774316›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2015

Summary of 2(nd) Nordic symposium on digital pathology.

Claes Lundström, Sten Thorstenson, Marie Waltersson, Anders Persson, Darren Treanor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Summary of the 4Journal of pathology informatics · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Summary of third Nordic symposium on digital pathology.Journal of pathology informatics · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claes LundströmCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden ; Sectra AB, Linköping, Sweden.
Sten ThorstensonDepartment of Pathology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Marie WalterssonCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anders PerssonCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Darren TreanorCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden ; Section of Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, England ; Department of Cellular Pathology, St. James University Hospital, Leeds, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Techniques for digital pathology are envisioned to provide great benefits in clinical practice, but experiences also show that solutions must be carefully crafted. The Nordic countries are far along the path toward the use of whole-slide imaging in clinical routine. The Nordic Symposium on Digital Pathology (NDP) was created to promote knowledge exchange in this area, between stakeholders in health care, industry, and academia. This article is a summary of the NDP 2014 symposium, including conclusions from a workshop on clinical adoption of digital pathology among the 144 attendees.

Indexed as

Clinical adoptiondigital pathologyimage analysisinformaticswhole-slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID25774316
PMCPMC4355840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.