Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25774293›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2015

BioMiCo: a supervised Bayesian model for inference of microbial community structure.

Mahdi Shafiei, Katherine A Dunn, Eva Boon, Shelley M MacDonald, David A Walsh, Hong Gu, Joseph P Bielawski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Universal abundance fluctuations across microbial communities, tropical forests, and urban populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Latent variable modeling for the microbiome.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mahdi ShafieiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada.
Katherine A DunnDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada.
Eva BoonDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada.
Shelley M MacDonaldDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada.
David A WalshDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec Canada.
Hong GuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada.
Joseph P BielawskiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada ; Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobiome samples often represent mixtures of communities, where each community is composed of overlapping assemblages of species. Such mixtures are complex, the number of species is huge and abundance information for many species is often sparse. Classical methods have a limited value for identifying complex features within such data.

resultsHere, we describe a novel hierarchical model for Bayesian inference of microbial communities (BioMiCo). The model takes abundance data derived from environmental DNA, and models the composition of each sample by a two-level hierarchy of mixture distributions constrained by Dirichlet priors. BioMiCo is supervised, using known features for samples and appropriate prior constraints to overcome the challenges posed by many variables, sparse data, and large numbers of rare species. The model is trained on a portion of the data, where it learns how assemblages of species are mixed to form communities and how assemblages are related to the known features of each sample. Training yields a model that can predict the features of new samples. We used BioMiCo to build models for three serially sampled datasets and tested their predictive accuracy across different time points. The first model was trained to predict both body site (hand, mouth, and gut) and individual human host. It was able to reliably distinguish these features across different time points. The second was trained on vaginal microbiomes to predict both the Nugent score and individual human host. We found that women having normal and elevated Nugent scores had distinct microbiome structures that persisted over time, with additional structure within women having elevated scores. The third was trained for the purpose of assessing seasonal transitions in a coastal bacterial community. Application of this model to a high-resolution time series permitted us to track the rate and time of community succession and accurately predict known ecosystem-level events.

conclusionBioMiCo provides a framework for learning the structure of microbial communities and for making predictions based on microbial assemblages. By training on carefully chosen features (abiotic or biotic), BioMiCo can be used to understand and predict transitions between complex communities composed of hundreds of microbial species.

Indexed as

Admixture modelBayesian modelHierarchical mixed-membership modelHumanMicrobial community structureMicrobiomeOTU abundance dataSupervised learningTemperate coastal ocean

Identifiers

PMID25774293
PMCPMC4359585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.