ArticlePlant methods2015
An ontology approach to comparative phenomics in plants.
Article in Plant methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- A sequence-based classifier distinguishes phenotype-associated genes from other gene models in plants.Genome research · 2026Article
- Constitutive and inducible oleoresin defenses share genetic architectures and mechanisms in Pinus taeda.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Improving annotation, access, and comparison of nutritional composition data for underutilized crops.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
- RWRtoolkit: multi-omic network analysis using random walks on multiplex networks in any species.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Genome-wide association studies from spoken phenotypic descriptions: a proof of concept from maize field studies.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- MENTOR: Multiplex Embedding of Networks for Team-Based Omics Research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Wisconsin diversity panel phenotypes: spoken descriptions of plants and supporting data.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Genotype and phenotype data standardization, utilization and integration in the big data era for agricultural sciences.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023Review
- Development of a knowledge graph framework to ease and empower translational approaches in plant research: a use-case on grain legumes.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Article
- Exploring the role of plant lysin motif receptor-like kinases in regulating plant-microbe interactions in the bioenergy cropComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Transforming the study of organisms: Phenomic data models and knowledge bases.PLoS computational biology · 2020Review
- Non-homology-based prediction of gene functions in maize (Zea mays ssp. mays).The plant genome · 2020Article
- Article
- Emerging Technologies in Algal Biotechnology: Toward the Establishment of a Sustainable, Algae-Based Bioeconomy.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Evolutionary characteristics of intergenic transcribed regions indicate rare novel genes and widespread noisy transcription in the Poaceae.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Trait ontology analysis based on association mapping studies bridges the gap between crop genomics and Phenomics.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Automated Methods Enable Direct Computation on Phenotypic Descriptions for Novel Candidate Gene Prediction.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Global agricultural concept space: lightweight semantics for pragmatic interoperability.NPJ science of food · 2019Article
- The Plant Ontology Facilitates Comparisons of Plant Development Stages Across Species.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- The Planteome database: an integrated resource for reference ontologies, plant genomics and phenomics.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlant phenotype datasets include many different types of data, formats, and terms from specialized vocabularies. Because these datasets were designed for different audiences, they frequently contain language and details tailored to investigators with different research objectives and backgrounds. Although phenotype comparisons across datasets have long been possible on a small scale, comprehensive queries and analyses that span a broad set of reference species, research disciplines, and knowledge domains continue to be severely limited by the absence of a common semantic framework.
resultsWe developed a workflow to curate and standardize existing phenotype datasets for six plant species, encompassing both model species and crop plants with established genetic resources. Our effort focused on mutant phenotypes associated with genes of known sequence in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. (Arabidopsis), Zea mays L. subsp. mays (maize), Medicago truncatula Gaertn. (barrel medic or Medicago), Oryza sativa L. (rice), Glycine max (L.) Merr. (soybean), and Solanum lycopersicum L. (tomato). We applied the same ontologies, annotation standards, formats, and best practices across all six species, thereby ensuring that the shared dataset could be used for cross-species querying and semantic similarity analyses. Curated phenotypes were first converted into a common format using taxonomically broad ontologies such as the Plant Ontology, Gene Ontology, and Phenotype and Trait Ontology. We then compared ontology-based phenotypic descriptions with an existing classification system for plant phenotypes and evaluated our semantic similarity dataset for its ability to enhance predictions of gene families, protein functions, and shared metabolic pathways that underlie informative plant phenotypes.
conclusionsThe use of ontologies, annotation standards, shared formats, and best practices for cross-taxon phenotype data analyses represents a novel approach to plant phenomics that enhances the utility of model genetic organisms and can be readily applied to species with fewer genetic resources and less well-characterized genomes. In addition, these tools should enhance future efforts to explore the relationships among phenotypic similarity, gene function, and sequence similarity in plants, and to make genotype-to-phenotype predictions relevant to plant biology, crop improvement, and potentially even human health.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.