Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25774007›Full record

ReviewExpert review of molecular diagnostics2015

Biomarker development for presymptomatic molecular diagnosis of preeclampsia: feasible, useful or even unnecessary?

Sinuhe Hahn, Olav Lapaire, Nandor Gabor Than

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of molecular diagnostics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Proteomic Profiles of Maternal Plasma Extracellular Vesicles for Prediction of Preeclampsia.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sinuhe HahnLaboratory for Prenatal Medicine, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, Hebelstrasse 20, CH 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Olav Lapaire
Nandor Gabor Than
University Hospital of Basel · CHInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past decade saw the advent of a number of promising biomarkers to detect pregnancies at risk for preeclampsia (PE), the foremost being those associated with an imbalance of angiogenic factors. In late pregnancy, these are useful for the detection of imminent cases of PE, while earlier they were more predictive for early- than late-onset PE. This suggests that there may be fundamental differences between the underlying pathology of these two PE forms. Therefore, it is possible that such a biological premise may limit the development of biomarkers that will permit the efficacious detection of both early- and late-onset PE via an analysis of first-trimester maternal blood samples. Consequently, a significant increase in our understanding of the underlying pathology of PE, using a variety of approaches ranging from systems biology to animal models, will be necessary in order to overcome this obstacle.

Indexed as

Asymptomatic DiseasesBiomarkersAnimalsFemaleGalectinsHumansImmunity, InnateIncidencePlacentaPre-EclampsiaPregnancyPregnancy ProteinsTime FactorsBiomarkersGalectinsLGALS13 protein, humanPregnancy Proteinsanimal modelearly-onset/late-onsetetiologyplacentapreeclampsiascreening

Identifiers

PMID25774007
PMCPMC4673513
OpenAlexW1973530734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.