Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25773986›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2015

A test of lens opacity as an indicator of preclinical Alzheimer Disease.

Ling Bei, Ying-Bo Shui, Fang Bai, Suzanne K Nelson, Gregory P Van Stavern, David C Beebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Ocular changes as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The Eye As a Biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ling BeiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ying-Bo ShuiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Fang BaiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Suzanne K NelsonDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Gregory P Van StavernDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: VanStavernG@vision.wustl.edu.
David C BeebeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Tammie Lee Smith Benzinger · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH CENTERP50AG005681 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 1985 to 2019
$52.1M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHINDLER, SUZANNE ELIZABETH · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
Ocular Oxygen Metabolism and the Etiology of Open Angle GlaucomaR01EY021515 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SIEGFRIED, CARLA J · 2011 to 2014
$2.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021515NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS P01 AG03991NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005681NIA NIH HHS P50 AG05681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies reported that characteristic lens opacities were present in Alzheimer Disease (AD) patients postmortem. We therefore determined whether cataract grade or lens opacity is related to the risk of Alzheimer dementia in participants who have biomarkers that predict a high risk of developing the disease. AD biomarker status was determined by positron emission tomography-Pittsburgh compound B (PET-PiB) imaging and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of Aβ42. Cognitively normal participants with a clinical dementia rating of zero (CDR = 0; N = 40) or with slight evidence of dementia (CDR = 0.5; N = 2) were recruited from longitudinal studies of memory and aging at the Washington University Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. The age, sex, race, cataract type and cataract grade of all participants were recorded and an objective measure of lens light scattering was obtained for each eye using a Scheimpflug camera. Twenty-seven participants had no biomarkers of Alzheimer dementia and were CDR = 0. Fifteen participants had biomarkers indicating increased risk of AD, two of which were CDR = 0.5. Participants who were biomarker positive were older than those who were biomarker negative. Biomarker positive participants had more advanced cataracts and increased cortical light scattering, none of which reached statistical significance after adjustment for age. We conclude that cataract grade or lens opacity is unlikely to provide a non-invasive measure of the risk of developing Alzheimer dementia.

Indexed as

Asymptomatic DiseasesAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAniline CompoundsBiomarkersCarbon RadioisotopesCataractDensitometryFemaleHumansLens, CrystallineLightMalePeptide Fragments2-(4'-(methylamino)phenyl)-6-hydroxybenzothiazoleAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)Aniline CompoundsBiomarkersCarbon RadioisotopesPeptide FragmentsThiazolesAlzheimer Disease biomarkersCataractLens opacityPreclinical Alzheimer DiseaseScheimpflug imaging

Identifiers

PMID25773986
PMCPMC4568178
OpenAlexW2033660865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.