Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25773713›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2015

Genes from scratch--the evolutionary fate of de novo genes.

Christian Schlötterer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. DetectNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of GC content on de novo gene birth.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Expression of De Novo Open Reading Frames in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christian SchlöttererInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Wien, Austria. Electronic address: Christian.schloetterer@vetmeduni.ac.at.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 22834Austrian Science Fund FWF P 27630Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although considered an extremely unlikely event, many genes emerge from previously noncoding genomic regions. This review covers the entire life cycle of such de novo genes. Two competing hypotheses about the process of de novo gene birth are discussed as well as the high death rate of de novo genes. Despite the high death rate, some de novo genes are retained and remain functional, even in distantly related species, through their integration into gene networks. Further studies combining gene expression with ribosome profiling in multiple populations across different species will be instrumental for an improved understanding of the evolutionary processes operating on de novo genes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenesAnimalsBiological EvolutionHumansde novo genesorphanspopulation geneticstranscription

Identifiers

PMID25773713
PMCPMC4383367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.