Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25773655›Full record

Observational studyRheumatology international2015

Patterns of use and dosing of tocilizumab in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine clinical practice: the ACT-LIFE study.

Alejandro Balsa, Juan Víctor Tovar Beltrán, Rafael Cáliz Cáliz, Isabel Mateo Bernardo, Rosario García-Vicuña, Manuel Rodríguez-Gómez, Miguel Angel Belmonte Serrano, Carlos Marras, Eduardo Loza Cortina, Eva Pérez-Pampin and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Rheumatology international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Alejandro BalsaDepartment of Rheumatology, IdiPAZ, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain, alejandro.balsa@salud.madrid.org.
Juan Víctor Tovar Beltrán
Rafael Cáliz Cáliz
Isabel Mateo Bernardo
Rosario García-Vicuña
Manuel Rodríguez-Gómez
Miguel Angel Belmonte Serrano
Carlos Marras
Eduardo Loza Cortina
Eva Pérez-Pampin
Vicente Vila
Complejo Hospitalario de Ourense · ESComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESGobierno de Navarra · ESHospital General Universitari de Castelló · ESHospital General Universitario de Elche · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Universitario del Vinalopó · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to identify and describe the patterns of use of tocilizumab in clinical practice to ensure safety and optimal management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This is a 12-month prospective observational study in patients with moderate or severe RA of ≥6 months' duration who have started tocilizumab after failure of at least one previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) including TNF inhibitors. For some analyses, patients were categorized by the use of tocilizumab as monotherapy or in combination, and by previous use of biological therapy. Overall, 379 were evaluable (84.4 % received tocilizumab after prior biologics and 78.4 % in combination with classic DMARDs). Tocilizumab was discontinued in 68/379 (17.9 %) patients after a median of 6.7 (3.7-10.4) months, mainly due to a lack of efficacy (24/379, 6.3 %) and adverse events (23/379, 6.1 %). Of 131 temporary interruptions of tocilizumab required in 101/379 (26.6 %) patients, 81/131 (61.8 %) were related to adverse events, and in 120/131 (91.6 %) cases, tocilizumab was reintroduced at 8 mg/kg. Thirty-six tocilizumab dose reductions occurred in 34/379 (9 %) patients due to abnormal laboratory values in 20/34 (55.6 %) cases. DAS28-ESR scores decreased from baseline (5.6 ± 1.0) to week 24 (3.0 ± 1.4) and week 52 (2.7 ± 1.3). DAS28 response differed between biologics-naive and biologics-experienced patients, both at weeks 24 and 52. In clinical practice, tocilizumab is effective in RA while retaining the expected safety and tolerability profile. Tocilizumab seems to be more effective for biologics-naive patients than for biologics-experienced patients, while it proves to be similarly effective when used in combination or monotherapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic Agentstocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID25773655
OpenAlexW1991881579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.