ArticleBiometrics2015
Incorporating founder virus information in vaccine field trials.
Article in Biometrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can incorporating genotyping data into efficacy estimators improve efficiency of early phase malaria vaccine trials?Malaria journal · 2023Article
- Vaccine efficacy at a point in time.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Estimation of vaccine efficacy for variants that emerge after the placebo group is vaccinated.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Sieve analysis using the number of infecting pathogens.Biometrics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vaccine clinical trials with active surveillance for infection often use the time to infection as the primary endpoint. A common method of analysis for such trials is to compare the times to infection between the vaccine and placebo groups using a Cox regression model. With new technology, we can sometimes additionally record the precise number of virions that cause infection rather than just the indicator that infection occurred. In this article, we develop a unified approach for vaccine trials that couples the time to infection with the number of infecting or founder viruses. We assume that the instantaneous risk of a potentially infectious exposure for individuals in the placebo and vaccine groups follows the same proportional intensity model. Following exposure, the number of founder viruses X* is assumed to be generated from some distribution on 0,1,…, which is allowed to be different for the two groups. Exposures that result in X*=0 are unobservable. We denote the placebo and vaccine means of X* by μ and μΔ so that 1-Δ measures the proportion reduction in the mean number of infecting virions due to vaccination per exposure. We develop different semi-parametric methods of estimating Δ. We allow the distribution of X* to be Poisson or unspecified, and discuss how to incorporate covariates that impact the time to exposure and/or X*. Interestingly Δ, which is a ratio of untruncated means, can be reliably estimated using truncated data (X*>0), even if the placebo and vaccine distributions of X* are completely unspecified. Simulations of vaccine clinical trials show that the method can reliably recover Δ in realistic settings. We apply our methods to an HIV vaccine trial conducted in injecting drug users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.