Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25773188›Full record

SynthesisDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2015

Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations--a meta-analysis.

Siegward D Heintze, Valentin Rousson, Reinhard Hickel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06485024 (Clinical Performance of Direct NanoHybrid Resin Composite Veneer Restorations Applied With or Without Modeling Resin), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06485024 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Performance of Direct NanoHybrid Resin Composite Veneer Restorations Applied With or Without Modeling Resin:a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled25ConditionsDental Wear, Dental DecayArmsModeling Resin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Performance of composite-reinforced glass ionomer liners in class V restorations.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. [Long-term prognosis and influencing factors of anterior composite resin restoration].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Siegward D HeintzeR&D, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein. Electronic address: siegward.heintze@ivoclarvivadent.com.
Valentin RoussonBiostatistics Unit, Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Reinhard HickelDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany.
Ivoclar Vivadent (Liechtenstein) · LILudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis is the first meta-analysis on the efficacy of composite resin restorations in anterior teeth. The objective of the present meta-analysis was to verify whether specific material classes, tooth conditioning methods and operational procedures influence the result for Class III and Class IV restorations. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe database SCOPUS and PubMed were searched for clinical trials on anterior resin composites without restricting the search to the year of publication. The inclusion criteria were: (1) prospective clinical trial with at least 2 years of observation; (2) minimal number of restorations at last recall=20; (3) report on drop-out rate; (4) report of operative technique and materials used in the trial, and (5) utilization of Ryge or modified Ryge evaluation criteria. For the statistical analysis, a linear mixed model was used with random effects to account for the heterogeneity between the studies. p-Values smaller than 0.05 were considered to be significant.

resultsOf the 84 clinical trials, 21 studies met the inclusion criteria, 14 of them for Class III restorations, 6 for Class IV restorations and 1 for closure of diastemata; the latter was included in the Class IV group. Twelve of the 21 studies started before 1991 and 18 before 2001. The estimated median overall success rate (without replacement) after 10 years for Class III composite resin restorations was 95% and for Class IV restorations 90%. The main reason for the replacement of Class IV restorations was bulk fractures, which occurred significantly more frequently with microfilled composites than with hybrid and macrofilled composites. Caries adjacent to restorations was infrequent in most studies and accounted only for about 2.5% of all replaced restorations after 10 years irrespective of the cavity class. Class III restorations with glass ionomer derivates suffered significantly more loss of anatomical form than did fillings with other types of material. When the enamel was acid-etched and no bonding agent was applied, significantly more restorations showed marginal staining and detectable margins compared to enamel etching with enamel bonding or the total etch technique; fillings with self-etching systems were in between of these two outcome variables. Bevelling of the enamel was associated with a significantly reduced deterioration of the anatomical form compared to no bevelling but not with less marginal staining or less detectable margins. The type of isolation (absolute/relative) had a statistically significant influence on marginal caries which, however, might be a random finding.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicColorComposite ResinsDental MaterialsDental Restoration FailureDental Restoration, PermanentHumansComposite ResinsDental MaterialsAdhesive systemAnterior restorationsClass III, Class IVColorComposite resinFractureMarginal integrity

Identifiers

PMID25773188
OpenAlexW2087841586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.