SynthesisDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2015
Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations--a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06485024 (Clinical Performance of Direct NanoHybrid Resin Composite Veneer Restorations Applied With or Without Modeling Resin), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Performance of Direct NanoHybrid Resin Composite Veneer Restorations Applied With or Without Modeling Resin:a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 183 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Direct Composite Restorations on Permanent Teeth in the Anterior and Posterior Region - An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline - Part 1: Indications for Composite Restorations.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2024Guideline
- A Three-step Etch-and-Rinse vs a Universal Adhesive in Nanohybrid Composite Anterior Restorations: A Retrospective Clinical Evaluation.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2023Trial
- Clinical performance of an alkasite-based bioactive restorative in class II cavities: a randomized clinical trial.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2023Trial
- Twenty-four-month clinical performance of a glass hybrid restorative in non-carious cervical lesions of patients with bruxism: a split-mouth, randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2020Trial
- Treatment preferences related to pulpectomy and prosthetic restorations among Lithuanian general dentists and prosthodontists.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Performance of composite-reinforced glass ionomer liners in class V restorations.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Balancing Demineralisation and Collagen Integrity: A Nanoscale Analysis of Etching Time in Human Dentin.International dental journal · 2026Article
- [Long-term prognosis and influencing factors of anterior composite resin restoration].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025Review
- 6-year clinical performance of prefabricated and clear template-formed resin composite veneers.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Quality and Educational Value of YouTube Videos on Class IV Resin Composite Restorations.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Push-out Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill Composites Used as Intracanal Anchorage Material.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2025Article
- Changes in vertical skeletal and neuromuscular balance in growing patients treated with AMCOP®: a cephalometric and EMG evaluation.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
- The role of visual aids in the clinical success of posterior restorations: Randomized controlled clinical trial.Heliyon · 2024Article
- A comparative study of polishing systems on optical properties and surface roughness of additively manufactured and conventional resin based composites.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Can wheel polishers improve surface properties and color stability of monochromatic resin composites?BMC oral health · 2024Article
- A Critical Review on the Factors Affecting the Bond Strength of Direct Restorative Material Alternatives to Amalgam.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Four-year Outcomes of Class III and IV Anterior Restorations Based on a Subset of German Health Insurance Data.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2024Article
- Article
- Randomized Clinical Trial on Direct Composite and Indirect Ceramic Laminate Veneers in Multiple Diastema Closure Cases: Two-Year Follow-Up.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis is the first meta-analysis on the efficacy of composite resin restorations in anterior teeth. The objective of the present meta-analysis was to verify whether specific material classes, tooth conditioning methods and operational procedures influence the result for Class III and Class IV restorations. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe database SCOPUS and PubMed were searched for clinical trials on anterior resin composites without restricting the search to the year of publication. The inclusion criteria were: (1) prospective clinical trial with at least 2 years of observation; (2) minimal number of restorations at last recall=20; (3) report on drop-out rate; (4) report of operative technique and materials used in the trial, and (5) utilization of Ryge or modified Ryge evaluation criteria. For the statistical analysis, a linear mixed model was used with random effects to account for the heterogeneity between the studies. p-Values smaller than 0.05 were considered to be significant.
resultsOf the 84 clinical trials, 21 studies met the inclusion criteria, 14 of them for Class III restorations, 6 for Class IV restorations and 1 for closure of diastemata; the latter was included in the Class IV group. Twelve of the 21 studies started before 1991 and 18 before 2001. The estimated median overall success rate (without replacement) after 10 years for Class III composite resin restorations was 95% and for Class IV restorations 90%. The main reason for the replacement of Class IV restorations was bulk fractures, which occurred significantly more frequently with microfilled composites than with hybrid and macrofilled composites. Caries adjacent to restorations was infrequent in most studies and accounted only for about 2.5% of all replaced restorations after 10 years irrespective of the cavity class. Class III restorations with glass ionomer derivates suffered significantly more loss of anatomical form than did fillings with other types of material. When the enamel was acid-etched and no bonding agent was applied, significantly more restorations showed marginal staining and detectable margins compared to enamel etching with enamel bonding or the total etch technique; fillings with self-etching systems were in between of these two outcome variables. Bevelling of the enamel was associated with a significantly reduced deterioration of the anatomical form compared to no bevelling but not with less marginal staining or less detectable margins. The type of isolation (absolute/relative) had a statistically significant influence on marginal caries which, however, might be a random finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.