Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25772899›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Neurology2015

Clinical trials in progressive multiple sclerosis: lessons learned and future perspectives.

Daniel Ontaneda, Robert J Fox, Jeremy Chataway

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03562975 (A Single-center Prospective Measurement of Upper Extremity Function in Multiple Sclerosis Patients With Advanced Disability Treated With Ocrevus™), which is not on this map. Cited by 95 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
23.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03562975 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Single-center Prospective Measurement of Upper Extremity Function in Multiple Sclerosis Patients With Advanced Disability Treated With Ocrevus™

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of South FloridaRan2018 to 2023Enrolled18ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Pathologic Processes, Demyelinating Diseases, Nervous System DiseasesArmsOcrelizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 216 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Sample enrichment for clinical trials to show delay of onset in huntington disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2019
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Neurofilament heavy chain in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in Neuroimmunological Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel OntanedaMellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic address: ontaned@ccf.org.
Robert J FoxMellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jeremy ChatawayQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Cleveland Clinic · USUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandKL2TR000440 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$11.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR0000440NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progressive multiple sclerosis is characterised clinically by the gradual accrual of disability independent of relapses and can occur with disease onset (primary progressive) or can be preceded by a relapsing disease course (secondary progressive). An effective disease-modifying treatment for progressive multiple sclerosis has not yet been identified, and so far the results of clinical trials have generally been disappointing. Ongoing advances in the knowledge of pathogenesis, in the identification of novel targets for neuroprotection, and in improved outcome measures could lead to effective treatments for progressive multiple sclerosis. In this Series paper, we summarise the lessons learned from completed clinical trials and perspectives from trials in progress in progressive multiple sclerosis. We review promising clinical, imaging, and biological markers, along with novel designs, for clinical trials. The use of more refined outcomes and truly neuroprotective drugs, coupled with more efficient trial design, has the capacity to deliver a new era of therapeutic discovery in this challenging area.

Indexed as

LearningClinical Trials as TopicForecastingHumansMultiple Sclerosis, Chronic ProgressiveTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25772899
PMCPMC4361791
OpenAlexW2072808323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.