Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25772872›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2016

Microbial abundance and community in subsurface flow constructed wetland microcosms: role of plant presence.

Qian Wang, Huijun Xie, Huu Hao Ngo, Wenshan Guo, Jian Zhang, Cui Liu, Shuang Liang, Zhen Hu, Zhongchen Yang, Congcong Zhao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  10. Impacting Microbial Communities and Absorbing Pollutants byInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qian WangShandong Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China.
Huijun XieEnvironmental Research Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China.
Huu Hao NgoSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Wenshan GuoSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Jian ZhangShandong Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China. zhangjian00@sdu.edu.cn.
Cui LiuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Texas Tech University, Broadway and Boston, Lubbock, TX, 79409-1042, USA.
Shuang LiangShandong Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China.
Zhen HuShandong Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China.
Zhongchen YangShandong Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China.
Congcong ZhaoShandong Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this research, the role of plants in improving microorganism growth conditions in subsurface flow constructed wetland (CW) microcosms was determined. In particular, microbial abundance and community were investigated during summer and winter in Phragmites australis-planted CW microcosms (PA) and unplanted CW microcosms (control, CT). Results revealed that the removal efficiencies of pollutants and microbial community structure varied in winter with variable microbial abundance. During summer, PA comprised more dominant phyla (e.g., Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes), whereas CT contained more Cyanobacteria and photosynthetic bacteria. During winter, the abundance of Proteobacteria was >40 % in PA but dramatically decreased in CT. Moreover, Cyanobacteria and photosynthetic bacterial dominance in CT decreased. In both seasons, bacteria were more abundant in root surfaces than in sand. Plant presence positively affected microbial abundance and community. The potential removal ability of CT, in which Cyanobacteria and photosynthetic bacteria were abundant during summer, was more significantly affected by temperature reduction than that of PA with plant presence.

Indexed as

Microbial ConsortiaWetlandsCyanobacteriaPoaceaeProteobacteriaSeasonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater Pollutants, ChemicalConstructed wetlandMicrobial abundanceMicrobial communitySummerWinter

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.