Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25772543›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2015

Cardiac response to low-energy field pacing challenges the standard theory of defibrillation.

Bryan J Caldwell, Mark L Trew, Arkady M Pertsov

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Bryan J CaldwellFrom the Department of Pharmacology, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse (B.J.C., A.M.P.); and Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand (M.L.T.).
Mark L TrewFrom the Department of Pharmacology, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse (B.J.C., A.M.P.); and Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand (M.L.T.). m.trew@auckland.ac.nz.
Arkady M PertsovFrom the Department of Pharmacology, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse (B.J.C., A.M.P.); and Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand (M.L.T.).
Auckland Institute of Studies · NZ

Funding

Depth-resolved imaging of myocardial excitationR01HL071762 · NHLBI · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI PERTSOV, ARKADY M · 2003 to 2011
$2.1M
Development of new NIR probes to study human cardiac excitationR03TW008039 · FIC · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI PERTSOV, ARKADY M · 2009 to 2011
$106k
FIC NIH HHS R03 TW008039FIC NIH HHS R03TW008039NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL07162NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL071762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe electric response of myocardial tissue to periodic field stimuli has attracted significant attention as the basis for low-energy antifibrillation pacing, potentially more effective than traditional single high-energy shocks. In conventional models, an electric field produces a highly nonuniform response of the myocardial wall, with discrete excitations, or hot spots (HS), occurring at cathodal tissue surfaces or large coronary vessels. We test this prediction using novel 3-dimensional tomographic optical imaging. METHODS AND

resultsExperiments were performed in isolated coronary perfused pig ventricular wall preparations stained with near-infrared voltage-sensitive fluorescent dye DI-4-ANBDQBS. The 3-dimensional coordinates of HS were determined using alternating transillumination. To relate HS formation with myocardial structures, we used ultradeep confocal imaging (interrogation depths, >4 mm). The peak HS distribution is located deep inside the heart wall, and the depth is not significantly affected by field polarity. We did not observe the strong colocalization of HS with major coronary vessels anticipated from theory. Yet, we observed considerable lateral displacement of HS with field polarity reversal. Models that de-emphasized lateral intracellular coupling and accounted for resistive heterogeneity in the extracellular space showed similar HS distributions to the experimental observations.

conclusionsThe HS distributions within the myocardial wall and the significant lateral displacements with field polarity reversal are inconsistent with standard theories of defibrillation. Extended theories based on enhanced descriptions of cellular scale electric mechanisms may be necessary. The considerable lateral displacement of HS with field polarity reversal supports the hypothesis of biphasic stimuli in low-energy antifibrillation pacing being advantageous.

Indexed as

2-NaphthylamineAction PotentialsAnimalsCardiac Pacing, ArtificialElectric CountershockFluorescent DyesHeartImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMicroscopy, ConfocalModels, AnimalQuinolinium CompoundsSwineTime FactorsVoltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging1-(4-sulfanatobutyl)-4-(beta-(2-(di-n-butylamino)-6-naphthyl)butadienyl)quinolinium betaine2-NaphthylamineFluorescent DyesQuinolinium Compoundscomputer modelselectrical stimulationoptical imaging

Identifiers

PMID25772543
PMCPMC4472493
OpenAlexW2170473211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.