ArticleThe spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society2015
Clinical decision rule for primary care patient with acute low back pain at risk of developing chronic pain.
Article in The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- The clinical course of acute, subacute and persistent low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024Pooled it
- Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Psychosocial predictors in the transition from acute to chronic pain: a systematic review.Psychology, health & medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Biobehavioral phenotypes of chronic low back pain: Psychosocial subgroup identification using latent profile analysis.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Review
- [Psychosocial risk factors for chronic back pain in the general population and in competitive sports : From theory to clinical screening-a review from the MiSpEx network].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2018Review
- Early Factors Associated with the Development of Chronic Pain in Trauma Patients.Pain research & management · 2018Observational
- Outcomes indicators and a risk classification system for spinal manipulation under anesthesia: a narrative review and proposal.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2018Review
- Comparison of Low Back Pain Recovery and Persistence: A Descriptive Study of Characteristics at Pain Onset.Biological research for nursing · 2016Article
- Getting "Unstuck": A Multi-Site Evaluation of the Efficacy of an Interdisciplinary Pain Intervention Program for Chronic Low Back Pain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background contextPrimary care clinicians need to identify candidates for early interventions to prevent patients with acute pain from developing chronic pain. PURPOSE: We conducted a 2-year prospective cohort study of risk factors for the progression to chronic pain and developed and internally validated a clinical decision rule (CDR) that stratifies patients into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups for chronic pain. STUDY DESIGN/
settingThis is a prospective cohort study in primary care. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with acute low back pain (LBP, ≤30 days duration) were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were self-reported perceived nonrecovery and chronic pain.
methodsPatients were surveyed at baseline, 6 months, and 2 years. We conducted bivariate and multivariate regression analyses of demographic, clinical, and psychosocial variables for chronic pain outcomes, developed a CDR, and assessed its performance by calculating the bootstrapped areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and likelihood ratios.
resultsSix hundred five patients enrolled: 13% had chronic pain at 6 months and 19% at 2 years. An eight-item CDR was most parsimonious for classifying patients into three risk levels. Bootstrapped AUC was 0.76 (0.70-0.82) for the 6-month CDR. Each 10-point score increase (60-point range) was associated with an odds ratio of 11.1 (10.8-11.4) for developing chronic pain. Using a less than 5% probability of chronic pain as the cutoff for low risk and a greater than 40% probability for high risk, likelihood ratios were 0.26 (0.14-0.48) and 4.4 (3.0-6.3) for these groups, respectively.
conclusionsA CDR was developed that may help primary care clinicians classify patients with strictly defined acute LBP into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups for developing chronic pain and performed acceptably in 1,000 bootstrapped replications. Validation in a separate sample is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.