Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25771360›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2015

Minibeam therapy with protons and light ions: physical feasibility and potential to reduce radiation side effects and to facilitate hypofractionation.

F Avraham Dilmanian, John G Eley, Sunil Krishnan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Proton minibeam radiotherapy: a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Optical imaging of muons.Scientific reports · 2020
    Article
  12. Immunomodulatory Effects of Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Current Review of Spatial Fractionation: Back to the Future?International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2019
    Review
  18. Spatially fractionated proton minibeams.The British journal of radiology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Proton Grid Therapy: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Technology in cancer research & treatment · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F Avraham DilmanianDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Neurology, and Radiology, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York. Electronic address: avraham.dilmanian@stonybrook.edu.
John G EleyDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sunil KrishnanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USStony Brook University Hospital · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite several advantages of proton therapy over megavoltage x-ray therapy, its lack of proximal tissue sparing is a concern. The method presented here adds proximal tissue sparing to protons and light ions by turning their uniform incident beams into arrays of parallel, small, or thin (0.3-mm) pencil or planar minibeams, which are known to spare tissues. As these minibeams penetrate the tissues, they gradually broaden and merge with each other to produce a solid beam. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Broadening of 0.3-mm-diameter, 109-MeV proton pencil minibeams was measured using a stack of radiochromic films with plastic spacers. Monte Carlo simulations were used to evaluate the broadening in water of minibeams of protons and several light ions and the dose from neutron generated by collimator.

resultsA central parameter was tissue depth, where the beam full width at half maximum (FWHM) reached 0.7 mm, beyond which tissue sparing decreases. This depth was 22 mm for 109-MeV protons in a film stack. It was also found by simulations in water to be 23.5 mm for 109 MeV proton pencil minibeams and 26 mm for 116 MeV proton planar minibeams. For light ions, all with 10 cm range in water, that depth increased with particle size; specifically it was 51 mm for Li-7 ions. The ∼2.7% photon equivalent neutron skin dose from the collimator was reduced 7-fold by introducing a gap between the collimator and the skin.

conclusionsProton minibeams can be implemented at existing particle therapy centers. Because they spare the shallow tissues, they could augment the efficacy of proton therapy and light particle therapy, particularly in treating tumors that benefit from sparing of proximal tissues such as pediatric brain tumors. They should also allow hypofractionated treatment of all tumors by allowing the use of higher incident doses with less concern about proximal tissue damage.

Indexed as

Dose Fractionation, RadiationBrain NeoplasmsChildFeasibility StudiesHeliumHumansIsotopesLithiumMonte Carlo MethodOrgan Sparing TreatmentsProton TherapyRadiation InjuriesHeliumIsotopesLithium

Identifiers

PMID25771360
PMCPMC4810455
OpenAlexW1990457914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.