Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25771021›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2015

Tissue engineering a surrogate niche for metastatic cancer cells.

F Philipp Seib, Janice E Berry, Yusuke Shiozawa, Russell S Taichman, David L Kaplan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Silk Bioconjugates: From Chemistry and Concept to Application.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024
    Review
  6. An engineered niche delineates metastatic potential of breast cancer.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nanostructured Biomaterials forCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
  10. Multicellular 3D Models to Study Tumour-Stroma Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Implantable and Injectable Biomaterial Scaffolds for Cancer Immunotherapy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Bioengineered models to study tumor dormancy.Journal of biological engineering · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

F Philipp SeibStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, 161 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK.
Janice E BerryDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Yusuke ShiozawaDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Russell S TaichmanDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
David L KaplanTufts University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 4 Colby Street Medford, MA 02155, USA. Electronic address: David.Kaplan@tufts.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USTufts University · USUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

Tumor microvesicle-mediated modulation of the bone microenvironmentP01CA093900 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KELLER, EVAN T · 2004 to 2024
$29.6M
Translational Bioreactors - Engineering Complex TissuesP41EB002520 · NIBIB · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2004 to 2018
$16.7M
Mechanisms That Regulate Dormancy of Disseminated Tumor Cells in the Bone MarrowU54CA163124 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHIOZAWA, YUSUKE · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA093900NCI NIH HHS CA163124NCI NIH HHS CA166307NCI NIH HHS P01 CA093900NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163124NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002520NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002520-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In breast and prostate cancer patients, the bone marrow is a preferred site of metastasis. We hypothesized that we could use tissue-engineering strategies to lure metastasizing cancer cells to tissue-engineered bone marrow. First, we generated highly porous 3D silk scaffolds that were biocompatible and amenable to bone morphogenetic protein 2 functionalization. Control and functionalized silk scaffolds were subcutaneously implanted in mice and bone marrow development was followed. Only functionalized scaffolds developed cancellous bone and red bone marrow, which appeared as early as two weeks post-implantation and further developed over the 16-week study period. This tissue-engineered bone marrow microenvironment could be readily manipulated in situ to understand the biology of bone metastasis. To test the ability of functionalized scaffolds to serve as a surrogate niche for metastasis, human breast cancer cells were injected into the mammary fat pads of mice. The treatment of animals with scaffolds had no significant effect on primary tumor growth. However, extensive metastasis was observed in functionalized scaffolds, and the highest levels for scaffolds that were in situ manipulated with receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL). We also applied this tissue-engineered bone marrow model in a prostate cancer and experimental metastasis setting. In summary, we were able to use tissue-engineered bone marrow to serve as a target or "trap" for metastasizing cancer cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone MarrowBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCellular MicroenvironmentFemaleHumansMaleMice, Inbred C57BLNeoplasm MetastasisProstatic NeoplasmsTissue EngineeringBoneBreast cancerCancerMetastasisSilk

Identifiers

PMID25771021
PMCPMC4367489
OpenAlexW1980471134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.