Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25770818›Full record

ReviewBrain research2015

What goes up, can come down: Novel brain stimulation paradigms may attenuate craving and craving-related neural circuitry in substance dependent individuals.

Colleen A Hanlon, Logan T Dowdle, Christopher W Austelle, William DeVries, Oliver Mithoefer, Bashar W Badran, Mark S George

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 94 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03737032 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Theta Burst Stimulation in Young Adults With Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorErika ForbesRan2020 to 2022Enrolled29ConditionsDepressionArmsIntermittent Theta Burst Stimulation, Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation, Sham Theta Burst Stimulation
NCT03924024 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Orthopaedic Trauma Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled0ConditionsOrthopaedic TraumaArmsAccelerated intermittent theta burst treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colleen A HanlonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USA; Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USA; Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, USA. Electronic address: hanlon@musc.edu.
Logan T DowdleDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USA; Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USA.
Christopher W AustelleDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USA.
William DeVriesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USA.
Oliver MithoeferDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USA.
Bashar W BadranDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USA; Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USA.
Mark S GeorgeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USA; Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USA; Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, USA; Ralph H Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

TREATING ETHANOL WITHDRAWAL WITH LORAZEPAM/NALTREXONEP50AA010761 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI HOWARD C. BECKER · 1996 to 2026
$46.8M
Selective Restoration of KCNQ Channel Inhibition in the PFC to Inhibit Cue-InducP50DA015369 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KALIVAS, PETER W · 2003 to 2017
$18.6M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR000062 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$9.4M
Longitudinal study of functional connectivity among cocaine users in treatmentR01DA036617 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HANLON, COLLEEN A · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Summer Undergraduate Research Program in Substance Use DisordersR25DA033680 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI ANTONIETA LAVIN · 2012 to 2026
$1.5M
Cortical Inhibition and Corpus Callosum Integrity in Cocaine UsersK01DA027756 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HANLON, COLLEEN A · 2010 to 2014
$801k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000062NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA010761NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA027756NIDA NIH HHS K01DA027756NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA015369NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036617NIDA NIH HHS R01DA036617NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA033680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulnerability to drug related cues is one of the leading causes for continued use and relapse among substance dependent individuals. Using drugs in the face of cues may be associated with dysfunction in at least two frontal-striatal neural circuits: (1) elevated activity in medial and ventral areas that govern limbic arousal (including the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and ventral striatum) or (2) depressed activity in dorsal and lateral areas that govern cognitive control (including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and dorsal striatum). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is emerging as a promising new tool for the attenuation of craving among multiple substance dependent populations. To date however, nearly all repetitive TMS studies in addiction have focused on amplifying activity in frontal-striatal circuits that govern cognitive control. This manuscript reviews recent work using TMS as a tool to decrease craving for multiple substances and provides a theoretical model for how clinical researchers might approach target and frequency selection for TMS of addiction. To buttress this model, preliminary data from a single-blind, sham-controlled, crossover study of 11 cocaine-dependent individuals is also presented. These results suggest that attenuating MPFC activity through theta burst stimulation decreases activity in the striatum and anterior insula. It is also more likely to attenuate craving than sham TMS. Hence, while many TMS studies are focused on applying LTP-like stimulation to the DLPFC, the MPFC might be a new, efficacious, and treatable target for craving in cocaine dependent individuals.

Indexed as

BrainCravingHumansNeural PathwaysSubstance-Related DisordersTranscranial Magnetic StimulationBA 10Brain stimulationCaudateFunctional MRIOrbitofrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID25770818
PMCPMC4899830
OpenAlexW2056084196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.