ReviewJournal of experimental botany2015
Modelling the coordination of the controls of stomatal aperture, transpiration, leaf growth, and abscisic acid: update and extension of the Tardieu-Davies model.
Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low wind, high impact: sustained low airflow alters water use efficiency and shapes plant acclimation.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
- Technological advances in imaging and modelling of leaf structural traits: a review of heat stress in wheat.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Source-sink manipulations through shading, crop load and water deficit affect plant morphogenesis and carbon sink priorities leading to contrasted plant carbon status in grapevine.Annals of botany · 2025Article
- Does pollination interact with the abiotic environment to affect plant reproduction?Annals of botany · 2025Article
- Article
- Sweet Cherry Plants Prioritize Their Response to Cope with Summer Drought, Overshadowing the Defense Response toPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Plant microphenotype: from innovative imaging to computational analysis.Plant biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Robotized indoor phenotyping allows genomic prediction of adaptive traits in the field.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Two decades of harnessing standing genetic variation for physiological traits to improve drought tolerance in maize.Journal of experimental botany · 2023Review
- Water use efficiency across scales: from genes to landscapes.Journal of experimental botany · 2023Review
- Parallels between drought and flooding: An integrated framework for plant eco-physiological responses to water stress.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Review
- GrapevineXL reliably predicts multi-annual dynamics of vine water status, berry growth, and sugar accumulation in vineyards.Horticulture research · 2023Article
- Abscisic acid modulates neighbor proximity-induced leaf hyponasty in Arabidopsis.Plant physiology · 2023Article
- Crop/Plant Modeling Supports Plant Breeding: II. Guidance of Functional Plant Phenotyping for Trait Discovery.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Review
- Hormonal and environmental signaling pathways target membrane water transport.Plant physiology · 2021Review
- Exogenous Abscisic Acid Priming Modulates Water Relation Responses of Two Tomato Genotypes With Contrasting Endogenous Abscisic Acid Levels to Progressive Soil Drying Under Elevated COFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Use of hydraulic traits for modeling genotype-specific acclimation in cotton under drought.The New phytologist · 2020Article
- Simulating the effect of flowering time on maize individual leaf area in contrasting environmental scenarios.Journal of experimental botany · 2020Article
- A Dynamic Model for Strategies and Dynamics of Plant Water-Potential Regulation Under Drought Conditions.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Are Aquaporins Expressed in Stomatal Complexes Promising Targets to Enhance Stomatal Dynamics?Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stomatal aperture, transpiration, leaf growth, hydraulic conductance, and concentration of abscisic acid in the xylem sap ([ABA]xyl) vary rapidly with time of day. They follow deterministic relations with environmental conditions and interact in such a way that a change in any one of them affects all the others. Hence, approaches based on measurements of one variable at a given time or on paired correlations are prone to a confusion of effects, in particular for studying their genetic variability. A dynamic model allows the simulation of environmental effects on the variables, and of multiple feedbacks between them at varying time resolutions. This paper reviews the control of water movement through the plant, stomatal aperture and growth, and translates them into equations in a model. It includes recent progress in understanding the intrinsic and environmental controls of tissue hydraulic conductance as a function of transpiration rate, circadian rhythms, and [ABA]xyl. Measured leaf water potential is considered as the water potential of a capacitance representing mature tissues, which reacts more slowly to environmental cues than xylem water potential and expansive growth. Combined with equations for water and ABA fluxes, it results in a dynamic model able to simulate variables with genotype-specific parameters. It allows adaptive roles for hydraulic processes to be proposed, in particular the circadian oscillation of root hydraulic conductance. The script of the model, in the R language, is included together with appropriate documentation and examples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.