Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25770310›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2015

Impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on post-stroke dysmnesia and the role of BDNF Val66Met SNP.

Haitao Lu, Tong Zhang, Mei Wen, Li Sun

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05231694 (Specific Stimulation Mode Electroacupuncture Combined With NGF for Recovery Period of Ischemic Stroke:Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05231694 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Specific Stimulation Mode Electroacupuncture Combined With NGF for Recovery Period of Ischemic Stroke:Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Third Affiliated hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled288ConditionsIschemic StrokeArmsNerver growth factor (NGF) injection, Placebo injection, EA intervention, sham EA intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Narrative Review of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke Rehabilitation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haitao LuDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China (mainland).
Tong ZhangDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China (mainland).
Mei WenDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine of China, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China (mainland).
Li SunDepartment of Neurology, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China (mainland).
China Rehabilitation Research Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on dysmnesia and the impact of brain nucleotide neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). This study investigated the impact of low-frequency rTMS on post-stroke dysmnesia and the impact of BDNF Val66Met SNP. MATERIAL AND

methodsForty patients with post-stroke dysmnesia were prospectively randomized into the rTMS and sham groups. BDNF Val66Met SNP was determined using restriction fragment length polymorphism. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Loewenstein Occupational Therapy of Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA), and Rivermead Behavior Memory Test (RBMT) scores, as well as plasma BDNF concentrations, were measured at baseline and at 3 days and 2 months post-treatment.

resultsMoCA, LOTCA, and RBMT scores were higher after rTMS. Three days after treatment, BDNF decreased in the rTMS group but it increased in the sham group (P<0.05). Two months after treatment, RMBT scores in the rTMS group were higher than in the sham group, but not MoCA and LOTCA scores.

conclusionsLow-frequency rTMS may improve after-stoke memory through various pathways, which may involve polymorphisms and several neural genes, but not through an increase in BDNF levels.

Indexed as

MemoryTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultAmino Acid SubstitutionBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideStrokeBrain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

Identifiers

PMID25770310
PMCPMC4370352
OpenAlexW2061663898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.