Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25770263›Full record

ArticleAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2015

Implausible data, false memories, and the status quo in dietary assessment.

Edward Archer, Steven N Blair

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The use of implausible data without caveats is misleading.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edward ArcherFrom the Office of Energetics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (EA, e-mail: archer1@uab.edu); and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC (SNB).
Steven N BlairFrom the Office of Energetics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (EA, e-mail: archer1@uab.edu); and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC (SNB).

Funding

University of Alabama at Birmingham's Diabetes Research CenterP30DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BARBARA A GOWER · 2013 to 2026
$19.5M
UAB Obesity Training ProgramT32DK062710 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI James O Hill, Brooks C Wingo · 2004 to 2026
$5.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079626NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK062710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

DietDiet SurveysEnergy IntakeHealthNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentNutrition PolicyFemaleHumansMaleNutrition Surveys

Identifiers

PMID25770263
PMCPMC4352183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.