Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25770231›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Barriers to early diagnosis of symptomatic breast cancer: a qualitative study of Black African, Black Caribbean and White British women living in the UK.

Claire E L Jones, Jill Maben, Grace Lucas, Elizabeth A Davies, Ruth H Jack, Emma Ream

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Behind the Screen: An Exploratory Study of Factors Influencing Breast Screening Uptake in Lancashire (UK).Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Racioethnic Disparities in Endometrial Cancer Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Ensuring equitable access to cancer care for Black patients in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Claire E L JonesKing's College London, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, London, UK.
Jill MabenNational Nursing Research Unit, King's College London, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, London, UK.
Grace LucasThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Elizabeth A DaviesFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Ruth H JackNational Cancer Intelligence Network, Public Health England, London, UK.
Emma ReamUniversity of Surrey, School of Health Sciences, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
King's College London · GBPublic Health England · GBRMIT University · AURoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKDepartment of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUnderstanding barriers to early diagnosis of symptomatic breast cancer among Black African, Black Caribbean and White British women in the UK.

designIn-depth qualitative interviews using grounded theory methods to identify themes. Findings validated through focus groups.

participants94 women aged 33-91 years; 20 Black African, 20 Black Caribbean and 20 White British women diagnosed with symptomatic breast cancer were interviewed. Fourteen Black African and 20 Black Caribbean women with (n=19) and without (n=15) breast cancer participated in six focus groups.

settingEight cancer centres/hospital trusts in London (n=5), Somerset (n=1), West Midlands (n=1) and Greater Manchester (n=1) during 2012-2013.

resultsThere are important differences and similarities in barriers to early diagnosis of breast cancer between Black African, Black Caribbean and White British women in the UK. Differences were influenced by country of birth, time spent in UK and age. First generation Black African women experienced most barriers and longest delays. Second generation Black Caribbean and White British women were similar and experienced fewest barriers. Absence of pain was a barrier for Black African and Black Caribbean women. Older White British women (≥70 years) and first generation Black African and Black Caribbean women shared conservative attitudes and taboos about breast awareness. All women viewed themselves at low risk of the disease, and voiced uncertainty over breast awareness and appraising non-lump symptoms. Focus group findings validated and expanded themes identified in interviews.

conclusionsFindings challenged reporting of Black women homogenously in breast cancer research. This can mask distinctions within and between ethnic groups. Current media and health promotion messages need reframing to promote early presentation with breast symptoms. Working with communities and developing culturally appropriate materials may lessen taboos and stigma, raise awareness, increase discussion of breast cancer and promote prompt help-seeking for breast symptoms among women with low cancer awareness.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlack PeopleBreast NeoplasmsCaribbean RegionDiagnostic Self EvaluationEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedPainQualitative ResearchONCOLOGYQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID25770231
PMCPMC4360845
OpenAlexW2123528215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.