Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25770221›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Gait and speed selection in slender inertial swimmers.

Mattia Gazzola, Médéric Argentina, L Mahadevan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
88.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Dissolution-driven propulsion of floating solids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gait change in tongue movement.Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dynamics and locomotion of flexible foils in a frictional environment.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mattia GazzolaSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;
Médéric ArgentinaUniversité Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Institut non linéaire de Nice, CNRS UMR 7335, 06560 Valbonne, France; Institut Universitaire de France, 75005 Paris, France; and.
L MahadevanSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; Departments of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 lm@seas.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USUniversité Côte d'Azur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inertial swimmers use flexural movements to push water and generate thrust. We quantify this dynamical process for a slender body in a fluid by accounting for passive elasticity and hydrodynamics and active muscular force generation and proprioception. Our coupled elastohydrodynamic model takes the form of a nonlinear eigenvalue problem for the swimming speed and locomotion gait. The solution of this problem shows that swimmers use quantized resonant interactions with the fluid environment to enhance speed and efficiency. Thus, a fish is like an optimized diode that converts a prescribed alternating transverse motion to forward motion. Our results also allow for a broad comparative view of swimming locomotion and provide a mechanistic basis for the empirical relation linking the swimmer's speed U, length L, and tail beat frequency f, given by U/L ~ f [Bainbridge R (1958) J Exp Biol 35:109-133]. Furthermore, we show that a simple form of proprioceptive sensory feedback, wherein local muscle activation is function of body curvature, suffices to drive elastic instabilities associated with thrust production and leads to a spontaneous swimming gait without the need for a central pattern generator. Taken together, our results provide a simple mechanistic view of swimming consistent with natural observations and suggest ways to engineer artificial swimmers for optimal performance.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBody CompositionElasticityFishesHydrodynamicsMovementPressureProprioceptionSwimminggait selectioninertial swimmingproprioception

Identifiers

PMID25770221
PMCPMC4386394
OpenAlexW1983659840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.