Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25770031›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of medicine2015

A Brief Patient Self-administered Substance Use Screening Tool for Primary Care: Two-site Validation Study of the Substance Use Brief Screen (SUBS).

Jennifer McNeely, Shiela M Strauss, Richard Saitz, Charles M Cleland, Joseph J Palamar, John Rotrosen, Marc N Gourevitch

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Risk of mental health disorders following traumatic ocular and orbital injury.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Machine Learning Helps in Prediction of Tobacco Smoking in Adolescents.International journal of preventive medicine · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer McNeelyDepartment of Population Health, New York University (NYU) School of Medicine, New York; Department of Medicine, New York University (NYU) School of Medicine, New York. Electronic address: jennifer.mcneely@nyumc.org.
Shiela M StraussNYU College of Nursing, New York.
Richard SaitzDepartment of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Clinical Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
Charles M ClelandNYU College of Nursing, New York.
Joseph J PalamarDepartment of Population Health, New York University (NYU) School of Medicine, New York.
John RotrosenDepartment of Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, New York.
Marc N GourevitchDepartment of Population Health, New York University (NYU) School of Medicine, New York; Department of Medicine, New York University (NYU) School of Medicine, New York.
New York University · USNew York College of Health Professions · USBoston Medical Center · US

Funding

Project-005UL1TR001445 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2015 to 2025
$103.5M
Transdisciplinary Theoretical Svnthesis and Development CoreP30DA011041 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI LINDA M COLLINS · 1998 to 2026
$38.9M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000038 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CRONSTEIN, BRUCE NEIL · 2012 to 2014
$16.8M
Screening for Substance Use with Computer Assisted Self Interview in Primary CareK23DA030395 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MCNEELY, JENNIFER · 2010 to 2014
$905k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000038NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001445NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA030395NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA027429NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA011041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstance use screening is widely encouraged in health care settings, but the lack of a screening approach that fits easily into clinical workflows has restricted its broad implementation. The Substance Use Brief Screen (SUBS) was developed as a brief, self-administered instrument to identify unhealthy use of tobacco, alcohol, illicit drugs, and prescription drugs. We evaluated the validity and test-retest reliability of the SUBS in adult primary care patients.

methodsAdults aged 18-65 years were enrolled from urban safety net primary care clinics to self-administer the SUBS using touch-screen tablet computers for a test-retest reliability study (n = 54) and a 2-site validation study (n = 586). In the test-retest reliability study, the SUBS was administered twice within a 2-week period. In the validation study, the SUBS was compared with reference standard measures, including self-reported measures and oral fluid drug tests. We measured test-retest reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the SUBS for detection of unhealthy use and substance use disorder for tobacco, alcohol, and drugs (illicit and prescription drug misuse).

resultsTest-retest reliability was good or excellent for each substance class. For detection of unhealthy use, the SUBS had sensitivity and specificity of 97.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.7-99.5) and 95.7% (95% CI, 92.4-97.8), respectively, for tobacco; and 85.2% (95% CI, 79.3-89.9) and 77.0% (95% CI, 72.6-81.1) for alcohol. For unhealthy use of illicit or prescription drugs, sensitivity was 82.5% (95% CI, 75.7-88.0) and specificity 91.1% (95% CI, 87.9-93.6). With respect to identifying a substance use disorder, the SUBS had sensitivity and specificity of 100.0% (95% CI, 92.7-100.0) and 72.1% (95% CI, 67.1-76.8) for tobacco; 93.5% (95% CI, 85.5-97.9) and 64.6% (95% CI, 60.2-68.7) for alcohol; and 85.7% (95% CI, 77.2-92.0) and 82.0% (95% CI, 78.2-85.3) for drugs. Analyses of area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) indicated good discrimination (AUC 0.74-0.97) for all substance classes. Assistance in completing the SUBS was requested by 11% of participants.

conclusionsThe SUBS was feasible for self-administration and generated valid results in a diverse primary care patient population. The 4-item SUBS can be recommended for primary care settings that are seeking to implement substance use screening.

Indexed as

Self ReportAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAlcoholismAmbulatory Care FacilitiesConfidence IntervalsFemaleHumansIllicit DrugsIncidenceInternetMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrescription Drug MisuseIllicit DrugsAlcoholIllicit drugsScreeningSubstance useTobaccoValidation

Identifiers

PMID25770031
PMCPMC4475501
OpenAlexW1979363419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.