Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25769979›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

Examining phylogenetic relationships among gibbon genera using whole genome sequence data using an approximate bayesian computation approach.

Krishna R Veeramah, August E Woerner, Laurel Johnstone, Ivo Gut, Marta Gut, Tomas Marques-Bonet, Lucia Carbone, Jeff D Wall, Michael F Hammer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evolution of CEACAM pathogen decoy receptors in primates.European journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Co-option of the lineage-specificProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A novel variant inNeuronal signaling · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Krishna R VeeramahArizona Research Laboratories Division of Biotechnology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794.
August E WoernerArizona Research Laboratories Division of Biotechnology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721.
Laurel JohnstoneArizona Research Laboratories Division of Biotechnology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721.
Ivo GutDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794.
Marta GutCentro Nacional de Analisis Genomico, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Tomas Marques-BonetCentro Nacional de Analisis Genomico, 08028 Barcelona, Spain Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats at Insitit de Biologia Evolutiva (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas/Universitat Pompeu Fabra), 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
Lucia CarboneDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239.
Jeff D WallInstitute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143.
Michael F HammerArizona Research Laboratories Division of Biotechnology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 mfh@email.arizona.edu.
University of Arizona · USCentro Nacional de Análisis Genómico · ESInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESOregon Health & Science University · USStony Brook University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Genomic Patterns of Polymorphism in PrimatesR01HG005226 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI HAMMER, MICHAEL F, WALL, JEFFREY D · 2010 to 2012
$1.7M
European Research Council 260372NHGRI NIH HHS R01_HG005226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gibbons are believed to have diverged from the larger great apes ∼16.8 MYA and today reside in the rainforests of Southeast Asia. Based on their diploid chromosome number, the family Hylobatidae is divided into four genera, Nomascus, Symphalangus, Hoolock, and Hylobates. Genetic studies attempting to elucidate the phylogenetic relationships among gibbons using karyotypes, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), the Y chromosome, and short autosomal sequences have been inconclusive . To examine the relationships among gibbon genera in more depth, we performed second-generation whole genome sequencing (WGS) to a mean of ∼15× coverage in two individuals from each genus. We developed a coalescent-based approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) method incorporating a model of sequencing error generated by high coverage exome validation to infer the branching order, divergence times, and effective population sizes of gibbon taxa. Although Hoolock and Symphalangus are likely sister taxa, we could not confidently resolve a single bifurcating tree despite the large amount of data analyzed. Instead, our results support the hypothesis that all four gibbon genera diverged at approximately the same time. Assuming an autosomal mutation rate of 1 × 10(-9)/site/year this speciation process occurred ∼5 MYA during a period in the Early Pliocene characterized by climatic shifts and fragmentation of the Sunda shelf forests. Whole genome sequencing of additional individuals will be vital for inferring the extent of gene flow among species after the separation of the gibbon genera.

Indexed as

GenomeModels, GeneticPhylogenyAnimalsBase SequenceBayes TheoremEvolution, MolecularHylobatesMolecular Sequence DataPolymorphism, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAapproximate Bayesian computationgibbon speciesrapid radiationwhole genome sequences

Identifiers

PMID25769979
PMCPMC4423371
OpenAlexW2126786937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.