Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25769546›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2015

The impact of graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplant in acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Marie Thérèse Rubio, Myriam Labopin, Didier Blaise, Gerard Socié, Rafael Rojas Contreras, Patrice Chevallier, Miguel A Sanz, Stéphane Vigouroux, Anne Huynh, Avichai Shimoni and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. HighCancer biology & therapy · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.

Marie Thérèse RubioHôpital Saint Antoine, Service d'Hématologie et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Paris, France Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France INSERM UMRs938, CDR Saint Antoine, Paris, France mt_rubio@hotmail.com.
Myriam LabopinHôpital Saint Antoine, Service d'Hématologie et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Paris, France EBMT Data Office, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France.
Didier BlaiseProgramme de Transplantation & Therapie Cellulaire Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Gerard SociéHôpital St. Louis, Dept. of Hematology - BMT, Paris, France.
Rafael Rojas ContrerasIMIBIC/Reina Sofia Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.
Patrice ChevallierCHU Nantes, Dept. D'Hématologie, France.
Miguel A SanzHospital Universidad La Fe, Servicio de Hematologia y Oncologia, Valencia, Spain.
Stéphane VigourouxCHU Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-leveque, Pessac, France.
Anne HuynhHôpital Purpan, CHU de Toulouse, Dept. Hematologie, France.
Avichai ShimoniDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
Claude-Eric BulaboisHôpital A. Michallon, Hématologie Clinique, Pole Cancérologie, Grenoble, France.
Nerea CaminosDonostia Hospital, San Sebastian, Spain;
Lucía López-CorralHospital Clinico, Servicio de Hematologia, Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Spain.
Arnon NaglerDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Tel-Aviv University, Israel EBMT Data Office, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France.
Mohamad MohtyHôpital Saint Antoine, Service d'Hématologie et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Paris, France Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France INSERM UMRs938, CDR Saint Antoine, Paris, France EBMT Data Office, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRTel Aviv University · ILBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRHôpital Albert Michallon · FRHôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque · FRHôpital Saint-Louis · FRHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca · ESInstituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba · ESSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of the intensity of graft-versus-host-disease immunoprophylaxis on transplantation outcomes in patients undergoing transplantation following reduced-intensity conditioning is unclear. This study addresses this issue in 228 adult patients above 50 years of age with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission given peripheral blood stem cells from HLA-identical siblings after fludarabine and 2 days of intravenous busulfan reduced-intensity conditioning. A total of 152 patients received anti-thymocyte globulin, either in combination with cyclosporine A in 86 patients (group 1), or with cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil or short course methotrexate in 66 patients (group 2). The remaining 76 patients did not receive anti-thymocyte globulin but were given cyclosporine A and methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil (group 3). Incidences of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host-disease were comparable in the three groups (16.5%, 29.5% and 19.5% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, P=0.15). In multivariate analysis, the absence of anti-thymocyte globulin was the only factor associated with a higher risk of chronic graft-versus-host-disease (P=0.005), while the use of triple immunosuppression (group 3) was associated with an increased risk of relapse (P=0.003). In comparison to anti-thymocyte globulin and cyclosporine A alone, the other two strategies of graft-versus-host-disease prophylaxis were associated with reduced leukemia-free survival and overall survival (P=0.001 for each parameter), independently of the dose of anti-thymocyte globulin. These data suggest that fine tuning of the intensity of this prophylaxis can affect the outcome of transplantation and that anti-thymocyte globulin and cyclosporine A alone should be the preferred combination with the fludarabine-busulfan reduced-intensity conditioning regimen and sibling donors.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationPremedicationTransplantation ConditioningAgedAntilymphocyte SerumFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsIncidenceLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAntilymphocyte SerumImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID25769546
PMCPMC4420218
OpenAlexW1918510565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.