Trial reportClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2015
Differences in Weight Loss Between Persons on Standard Balanced vs Nutrigenetic Diets in a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01859403 (Nutrigenomics), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Nutrigenomics: Personalizing Weight Loss for Obese Veterans
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Are There Any Effective Behavior Change Strategies for Communicating Genetic Risk in Obesity Prevention and Body Weight Reduction Interventions?Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026Pooled it
- In the context of the triple burden of malnutrition: A systematic review of gene-diet interactions and nutritional status.Critical reviews in food science and nutrition · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of Personalized Nutrition on Dietary, Physical Activity, and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- Scope of Use and Effectiveness of Dietary Interventions for Improving Health-Related Outcomes in Veterans: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- FTO genotype and weight loss: systematic review and meta-analysis of 9563 individual participant data from eight randomised controlled trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Pooled it
- Article
- Effects of personalized nutrition on cardiometabolic biomarkers in adults with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Nutrition & metabolism · 2026Review
- Toward standardized personalized nutrition: a methodological scoping review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults with overweight and obesity.Genes & nutrition · 2026Article
- Effect of gene-based vs. standard weight-loss recommendations on anthropometry, lipid and glucose markers, and dietary intake: a randomized controlled trial (the MyGeneMyDietGenes & nutrition · 2026Article
- Understanding and applying gene-environment interactions: a guide for nutrition professionals with an emphasis on integration in African research settings.Nutrition reviews · 2025Review
- Obesity and Nutrigenetics Testing: New Insights.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Genotype-based precision nutrition strategies for the prediction and clinical management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.World journal of diabetes · 2024Review
- Precision Nutrition to Improve Risk Factors of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.Current nutrition reports · 2023Review
- Characterizing Precision Nutrition Discourse on Twitter: Quantitative Content Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- A study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a gene-based nutrition and lifestyle recommendation for weight management among adults: the MyGeneMyDietFrontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Does personalised nutrition advice based on apolipoprotein E and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotype affect dietary behaviour?Nutrition and health · 2022Article
- Precision Medicine for Obesity.Digestive disease interventions · 2021Article
- Study protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial incorporated into the Group Lifestyle Balance™ program: the nutrigenomics, overweight/obesity and weight management trial (the NOW trial).BMC public health · 2019Article
- A Scientific Perspective of Personalised Gene-Based Dietary Recommendations for Weight Management.Nutrients · 2019Review
- Alignment of diet prescription to genotype does not promote greater weight loss success in women with obesity participating in an exercise and weight loss program.Obesity science & practice · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsMany companies provide genetic tests for obesity-related polymorphisms (nutrigenetics) and make dietary recommendations for weight loss that are based on the results. We performed a randomized controlled trial to determine whether more participants who followed a nutrigenetic-guided diet lost ≥5% of their body weight than participants on a standard balanced diet for 8 and 24 weeks.
methodsWe performed a prospective study of 51 obese or overweight U.S. veterans on an established weight management program at the Veterans Administration San Diego Healthcare System (the MOVE! program). Participants were randomly assigned to groups placed on a nutrigenetic-guided diet (balanced, low-carbohydrate, low-fat, or Mediterranean; n = 30) or a standard balanced diet (n = 21). Nutrigenetic diets were selected on the basis of results from the Pathway FIT test.
resultsThere was no significant difference in the percentage of participants on the balanced diet vs the nutrigenetic-guided diet who lost 5% of their body weight at 8 weeks (35.0% ± 20.9% vs 26.9% ± 17.1%, respectively; P = .28) or at 24 weeks. Both groups had difficulty adhering to the diets. However, adherence to the nutrigenetic-guided diet correlated with weight loss (r = 0.74; P = 4.0 × 10(-5)), but not adherence to standard therapy (r = 0.34; P = .23). Participants who had low-risk polymorphisms for obesity lost more weight than all other participants at 8 weeks (5.0% vs 2.9%, respectively; P = .02) and had significantly greater reductions in body mass index (6.4% vs 3.6%, respectively; P = .03) and waist circumference (6.5% vs 2.6%, respectively; P = .02) at 24 weeks.
conclusionsIn a prospective study, a nutrigenetic-based diet did not increase weight loss compared with a standard balanced diet. However, genetic features can identify individuals most likely to benefit from a balanced diet weight loss strategy; these findings require further investigation. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01859403.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.