Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25769404›Full record

Trial reportMolecular oncology2015

Protein expression of BIRC5, TK1, and TOP2A in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours--A prognostic test after surgical resection.

Matthias Kolberg, Maren Høland, Guro E Lind, Trude H Ågesen, Rolf I Skotheim, Kirsten Sundby Hall, Nils Mandahl, Sigbjørn Smeland, Fredrik Mertens, Ben Davidson and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias KolbergDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Maren HølandDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Guro E LindDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Trude H ÅgesenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Rolf I SkotheimDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kirsten Sundby HallDepartment of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Nils MandahlDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Sigbjørn SmelandInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Fredrik MertensDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Ben DavidsonInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Pathology, Division of Diagnostics and Intervention, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ragnhild A LotheDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: rlothe@rr-research.no.
University of Oslo · NOOslo University Hospital · NOSkåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No consensus treatment regime exists beyond surgery for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNST), and the purpose of the present study was to find new approaches to stratify patients with good and poor prognosis and to better guide therapeutic intervention for this aggressive soft tissue cancer. From a total of 67 MPNSTs from Scandinavian patients with and without neurofibromatosis type 1, 30 MPNSTs were investigated by genome-wide RNA expression profiling and 63 MPNSTs by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis, and selected genes were submitted to analyses of disease-specific survival. The potential drug target genes survivin (BIRC5), thymidine kinase 1 (TK1), and topoisomerase 2-alpha (TOP2A), all encoded on chromosome arm 17q, were up-regulated in MPNST as compared to benign neurofibromas. Each of them was found to be independent prognostic markers on the gene expression level, as well as on the protein level. A prognostic profile was identified by combining the nuclear expression scores of the three proteins. For patients with completely resected tumours only 15% in the high risk group were alive after two years, as compared to 78% in the low risk group. In conclusion, we found a novel protein expression profile which identifies MPNST patients with inferior prognosis even after assumed curative surgery. The tested proteins are drug targets; therefore the expression profile may provide predictive information guiding the design of future clinical trials. Importantly, as the effect is seen on the protein level using IHC, the biomarker panel can be readily implemented in routine clinical testing.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticNeurilemmomaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, NeoplasmDisease-Free SurvivalDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsMaleMiddle AgedAntigens, NeoplasmBIRC5 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsSurvivinThymidine Kinasethymidine kinase 1TOP2A protein, humanBIRC5ImmunohistochemistryMPNSTPrognosisSurvivinTK1TOP2A

Identifiers

PMID25769404
PMCPMC5528761
OpenAlexW2029221495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.