Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25769273›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2015

Efficient semi-automatic 3D segmentation for neuron tracing in electron microscopy images.

Cory Jones, Ting Liu, Nathaniel Wood Cohan, Mark Ellisman, Tolga Tasdizen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cory JonesScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, United States; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, United States.
Ting LiuScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, United States; School of Computing, University of Utah, United States.
Nathaniel Wood CohanNational Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research, University of California, San Diego, United States.
Mark EllismanNational Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research, University of California, San Diego, United States.
Tolga TasdizenScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, United States; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, United States; School of Computing, University of Utah, United States. Electronic address: tolga@sci.utah.edu.

Funding

IVEM and Image Analysis ResourceP41GM103412 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ELLISMAN, MARK H · 2012 to 2019
$17.9M
SLASH: SCALABLE LARGE ANALYTIC SEGMENTATION HYBRIDR01NS075314 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ELLISMAN, MARK H, TASDIZEN, TOLGA · 2011 to 2014
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103412NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS075314-01NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the area of connectomics, there is a significant gap between the time required for data acquisition and dense reconstruction of the neural processes contained in the same dataset. Automatic methods are able to eliminate this timing gap, but the state-of-the-art accuracy so far is insufficient for use without user corrections. If completed naively, this process of correction can be tedious and time consuming. NEW

methodWe present a new semi-automatic method that can be used to perform 3D segmentation of neurites in EM image stacks. It utilizes an automatic method that creates a hierarchical structure for recommended merges of superpixels. The user is then guided through each predicted region to quickly identify errors and establish correct links.

resultsWe tested our method on three datasets with both novice and expert users. Accuracy and timing were compared with published automatic, semi-automatic, and manual results. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsPost-automatic correction methods have also been used in Mishchenko et al. (2010) and Haehn et al. (2014). These methods do not provide navigation or suggestions in the manner we present. Other semi-automatic methods require user input prior to the automatic segmentation such as Jeong et al. (2009) and Cardona et al. (2010) and are inherently different than our method.

conclusionUsing this method on the three datasets, novice users achieved accuracy exceeding state-of-the-art automatic results, and expert users achieved accuracy on par with full manual labeling but with a 70% time improvement when compared with other examples in publication.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPattern Recognition, AutomatedAnimalsConnectomeModels, NeurologicalNeurons3D segmentationConnectomicsElectron microscopyImage segmentationNeuron reconstructionSemi-automatic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID25769273
PMCPMC4398646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.